Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRascle, O,
dc.contributor.authorCharrier, M,
dc.contributor.authorLeFoll, D,
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, N,
dc.contributor.authorRees, T
dc.contributor.authorCoffee, P
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-05T09:01:09Z
dc.date.issued2015-05
dc.description.abstractAbstract: Objectives: This experiment investigated, following perceived failure, the immediate, long- term (i.e., durability) and cross-situational (i.e., generalization) effects of attribution-based feedback on expectations and behavioral persistence. Design: We used a 3x2 (Group x Time) experimental design over seven weeks with attributions, expectations of success, and persistence as dependent measures. Method: 49 novice participants were randomly assigned to one of three treatment (attributional feedback) groups: (a) functional (i.e., controllable and unstable); (b) dysfunctional (i.e., uncontrollable and stable); or (c) no feedback. Testing involved three sessions, in which participants completed a total of five trials across two performance tasks (golf-putting and dart-throwing). In order to track whether the attributional manipulation conducted within the context of the golf-putting task in Session 2 would generalize to a new situation, participants performed a dart-throwing task in Session 3, and their scores were compared with those recorded at baseline (in Session 1). Results: Analysis of pre- and post-intervention measures of attributions, expectations, and persistence revealed that the functional attributional feedback led to more personally controllable attributions following failure in a golf-putting task, together with increases in success expectations and persistence. In contrast, dysfunctional attributional feedback led to more personally uncontrollable and stable attributions following failure, together with lower success expectations and reduced persistence. These effects extended beyond the intervention period, were present up to four weeks post intervention, and were maintained even when participants performed a different (i.e., dart-throwing) task. Conclusions: The findings demonstrate that attributional feedback effects are durable over time and generalize across situations.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Carnegie Trust for the Universities of Scotlanden_GB
dc.description.sponsorship“Alliance: Franco-British Partnership Programme 2010” of The British Councilen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMinistere des Affaires etrangeres et europeennes, Programme Hubert Curien Allianceen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 18, pp. 68–74en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychsport.2015.01.003
dc.identifier.grantnumberProject Number 10021en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber22755 TJen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16454
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029215000047en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher's policyen_GB
dc.subjectSport psychologyen_GB
dc.subjectAttributional feedbacken_GB
dc.subjectFunctional / dysfunctional attributionsen_GB
dc.titleDurability and generalization of attribution-based feedback following failure: Effects on expectations and behavioral persistenceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1469-0292
dc.descriptionpublication-status: Accepteden_GB
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2015 Elsevier. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 2015, vol. 18, 68 -74en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPsychology of Sport and Exerciseen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record