Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWood, G
dc.contributor.authorBatt, J
dc.contributor.authorAppelboam, A
dc.contributor.authorHarris, A.
dc.contributor.authorWilson, Mark R.
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-21T08:16:44Z
dc.date.issued2013-06-27
dc.description.abstractBackground: The primary aim of this study is to understand more about the perceptual-cognitive mechanisms underpinning the expert advantage in electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation. While research has examined visual search processes in other aspects of medical decision-making (e.g. radiology), this is the first study to apply the paradigm to ECG interpretation. The secondary aim is to explore the role that clinical history plays in influencing visual search behavior and diagnostic decision-making. While clinical history may aid diagnostic decision-making, it may also bias the visual search process. Methods: Ten, final year medical students and ten consultant emergency medics were presented with sixteen ECG traces (eight with clinical history that was not manipulated independently of case) whilst wearing eye tracking equipment. The ECGs represented common abnormalities encountered in Emergency Departments, and were among those taught to final year medical students. Participants were asked to make a diagnosis on each presented trace and report their level of diagnostic confidence. Results: Experts made significantly faster, more accurate and more confident diagnoses, and this advantage was underpinned by differences in visual search behavior. Specifically, experts were significantly quicker at locating the leads of critical importance. Contrary to our hypothesis, clinical history had no significant effect on the readers’ ability to detect the abnormality or in making an accurate diagnosis. Conclusions: Accurate ECG interpretation appears dependent on the perceptual skill of pattern recognition and specifically the time to fixate the critical lead(s). There is potential clinical utility in developing perceptual training programs to train novices to recognize ‘normal’ traces.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 34, No. 1, pp. 75-83en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/0272989X13492016
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/16916
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23811761en_GB
dc.titleExploring the impact of expertise, clinical history and visual search on electrocardiogram interpretationen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2015-04-21T08:16:44Z
dc.identifier.issn0272-989X
pubs.declined2015-04-16T15:12:15.529+0100
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2013 by SAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.identifier.journalMedical Decision Makingen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record