dc.contributor.author | Verbruggen, Frederick | |
dc.contributor.author | McAndrew, Amy | |
dc.contributor.author | Weidemann, Gabrielle | |
dc.contributor.author | Stevens, Tobias | |
dc.contributor.author | McLaren, Ian P.L. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-01-15T11:11:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016-03-21 | |
dc.description.abstract | Cognitive control theories attribute action control to executive processes that modulate behavior based on expectancy or task rules. Here we examined corticospinal excitability and behavioral performance in a go/no-go task. Go and no-go trials were presented in runs of 5, and runs alternated predictably. At the beginning of each trial, subjects indicated whether they expected a go trial or a no-go trial. Analyses revealed that subjects immediately adjusted their expectancy ratings when a new run started. However, motor excitability was primarily associated with the properties of the previous trial, rather than the predicted properties of the current trial. We also observed a large go latency cost at the beginning of a go run. These findings indicate that actions in predictable environments are substantially influenced by previous events, even if this goes against conscious expectancies about upcoming events. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 27 (5), pp. 748 - 757 | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/0956797616631990 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19258 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Association for Psychological Science | en_GB |
dc.rights | This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Association for Psychological Science via the DOI in this record. | |
dc.subject | Executive control | en_GB |
dc.subject | expectancy | en_GB |
dc.subject | sequential effects | en_GB |
dc.subject | motor-evoked potentials | en_GB |
dc.subject | TMS | en_GB |
dc.title | Limits of Executive Control: Sequential Effects in Predictable Environments | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.identifier.issn | 1467-9280 | |
dc.description | The dataset for this article is available at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/19257. | |
dc.identifier.journal | Psychological Science | en_GB |