Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCivile, Ciro
dc.contributor.authorZhao, D
dc.contributor.authorKu, Y
dc.contributor.authorElchlepp, H
dc.contributor.authorLavric, Aureliu
dc.contributor.authorMcLaren, Ian P.L.
dc.date.accessioned2016-02-17T13:01:49Z
dc.date.issued2014-04
dc.description.abstractThe face inversion effect is a defection in performance in recognizing inverted faces compared with faces presented in their usual upright orientation typically believed to be specific for facial stimuli. McLaren (1997) was able to demonstrate that (a) an inversion effect could be obtained with exemplars drawn from a familiar category, such that upright exemplars were better discriminated than inverted exemplars; and (b) that the inversion effect required that the familiar category be prototype-defined. In this article, we replicate and extend these findings. We show that the inversion effect can be obtained in a standard old/new recognition memory paradigm, demonstrate that it is contingent on familiarization with a prototype-defined category, and establish that the effect is made up of two components. We confirm the advantage for upright exemplars drawn from a familiar, prototype-defined category, and show that there is a disadvantage for inverted exemplars drawn from this category relative to suitable controls. We also provide evidence that there is an N170 event-related potential signature for this effect. These results allow us to integrate a theory of perceptual learning originally proposed by McLaren, Kaye, and Mackintosh (1989) with explanations of the face inversion effect, first reported by Yin.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Key Fundamental Research (973) Programen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 40, Iss. 2, pp. 144 - 161en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1037/xan0000013
dc.identifier.grantnumber2013CB329501en_GB
dc.identifier.other2013-44947-001
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/19915
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherAmerican Psychological Associationen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24364668en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.apa.org/pubs/journals/xan/index.aspxen_GB
dc.rightsCopyright © 2014 American Psychological Association. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA journal. It is not the copy of record.en_GB
dc.subjectAnalysis of Varianceen_GB
dc.subjectElectroencephalographyen_GB
dc.subjectEvoked Potentials, Visualen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectLearningen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectPattern Recognition, Visualen_GB
dc.subjectPhotic Stimulationen_GB
dc.subjectRecognition (Psychology)en_GB
dc.subjectStudentsen_GB
dc.subjectUniversitiesen_GB
dc.titlePerceptual learning and inversion effects: Recognition of prototype-defined familiar checkerboards.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2016-02-17T13:01:49Z
dc.identifier.issn2329-8456
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited States
dc.descriptionPublisheden_GB
dc.descriptionJournal Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov'ten_GB
dc.identifier.eissn2329-8464
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognitionen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record