The psychology of scams: Provoking and committing errors of judgement
Lea, Stephen E. G.; Fischer, Peter; Evans, Kath M.
Date: 1 May 2009
Consultancy projects / reports
Publisher
Office of Fair Trading
Abstract
According to the Office of Fair Trading (2006), 3.2 million adults in the
UK fall victim to mass marketed scams every year, and collectively lose
£3.5 billion. Victims of scams are often labelled as 'greedy' or 'gullible'
and elicit the reaction, 'How on earth could anyone fall for that?'
However, such labels are unhelpful and ...
According to the Office of Fair Trading (2006), 3.2 million adults in the
UK fall victim to mass marketed scams every year, and collectively lose
£3.5 billion. Victims of scams are often labelled as 'greedy' or 'gullible'
and elicit the reaction, 'How on earth could anyone fall for that?'
However, such labels are unhelpful and superficial generalisations that
presume all of us are perfectly rational consumers, ignoring the fact that
all of us are vulnerable to a persuasive approach at one time or another.
Clearly, responding to a scam is an error of judgement – so our research
sought to identify the main categories of decision error that typify
victim responses, and to understand the psychology of persuasion
employed by scammers to try to provoke such errors.
Psychology - old structure
Collections of Former Colleges
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0