Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPorter, L
dc.contributor.authorBailey-Jones, C
dc.contributor.authorPriudokaite, G
dc.contributor.authorAllen, S
dc.contributor.authorWood, K
dc.contributor.authorStiles, K
dc.contributor.authorParvin, O
dc.contributor.authorJavaid, M
dc.contributor.authorVerbruggen, F
dc.contributor.authorLawrence, N
dc.date.accessioned2017-05-09T13:21:33Z
dc.date.issued2017-05-04
dc.description.abstractChildren consume too much sugar and not enough fruit and vegetables, increasing their risk of adverse health outcomes. Inhibitory control training (ICT) reduces children's and adults' intake of energy-dense foods in both laboratory and real-life settings. However, no studies have yet examined whether ICT can increase healthy food choice when energy-dense options are also available. We investigated whether a food-specific Go/No-Go task could influence the food choices of children aged 4–11, as measured by a hypothetical food choice task using healthy and unhealthy food images printed on cards. Participants played either an active game (healthy foods = 100% go, unhealthy foods = 100% no-go; Studies 1 & 2), a food control game (both healthy and unhealthy foods = 50% go, 50% no-go; Studies 1 & 2) or a non-food control game (sports equipment = 100% go, technology = 100% no-go; Study 2 only) followed by the choice task. In Study 2, food card choices were also measured before training to examine change in choices. A post-training real food choice task was added to check that choices made in the card-based task were representative of choices made when faced with real healthy and unhealthy foods. Overall, the active group chose the greatest number of healthy food cards. Study 2 confirmed that this was due to increases in healthy food card choice in this group only. Active group participants chose a greater number of healthy foods in the real food choice task compared to children in the non-food control group only. The results are discussed with reference to methodological issues and the development of future healthy eating interventions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by a studentship from the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC; Grant No. ES/J50015X/1) to LP. FV was supported by a starting grant from the European Research Council (ERC; Grant Agreement No. 312445), and a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationAvailable online 4 May 2017en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.appet.2017.05.010
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27443
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/27455
dc.rightsOpen Access funded by Economic and Social Research Council under a Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
dc.subjectInhibitory control trainingen_GB
dc.subjectResponse inhibitionen_GB
dc.subjectSnack food choiceen_GB
dc.subjectChildhood obesityen_GB
dc.subjectBehavior changeen_GB
dc.titleFrom cookies to carrots; the effect of inhibitory control training on children's snack selections (article)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn0195-6663
dc.descriptionThe dataset associated with this article is in ORE: http://hdl.handle.net/10871/27455en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalAppetiteen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Open Access funded by Economic and Social Research Council under a Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Open Access funded by Economic and Social Research Council under a Creative Commons license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/