Corrigendum to "The neural correlates of moral decision-making: A systematic review and meta-analysis of moral evaluations and response decision judgements" [Brain Cogn. 108 (2016) 88-97]
Garrigan, B; Adlam, ALR; Langdon, PE
Date: 11 November 2016
Journal
Brain and Cognition
Publisher
Elsevier
Publisher DOI
Abstract
A cluster-level thresholding error in the version of GingerALE software used by the authors (version 2.3.4) was reported by Eickhoff et al. (2016) recently. The authors subsequently re-ran the ALE analysis using version 2.3.6 of GingerALE. This resulted in a change to the meta-analysis clusters, with the two smallest clusters for moral ...
A cluster-level thresholding error in the version of GingerALE software used by the authors (version 2.3.4) was reported by Eickhoff et al. (2016) recently. The authors subsequently re-ran the ALE analysis using version 2.3.6 of GingerALE. This resulted in a change to the meta-analysis clusters, with the two smallest clusters for moral evaluations (ME) and moral response decisions (MRD) being no longer being significant. There was no change to the conjunction analysis, or to the ME-MRD contrast (still no significant clusters). The results for the MRD-ME contrast are slightly different after re-running the analysis, although the area labels remain the same. Table 1 below shows the corrected results obtained from re-running the analysis in GingerALE version 2.3.6 and Fig. 1 displays the brain activation maps for MEs, MRDs and the MRD-ME contrast based on the revised analysis.
Psychology - old structure
Collections of Former Colleges
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0