Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWestage, B
dc.contributor.authorDunning, D
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, H
dc.contributor.authorAdlam, AR
dc.date.accessioned2017-08-31T08:17:53Z
dc.date.issued2017-10-01
dc.description.abstractDespite controversy surrounding the effectiveness of working memory training, Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT, Pearson) remains a popular choice of intervention. We surveyed 100 CWMT practitioners from Australia, U.S.A., the Netherlands, and the U.K. to find out how CWMT is used, who with, and what outcomes are measured. Practitioners reported that CWMT was easy-to-use and a valuable use of clinical resources. Findings are discussed in relation to current research and recommendations for practice are made.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis project was supported by generous grants from the Henry Smith Charity and Action Medical Research.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationIssue 4, October 2017en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/29134
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBritish Psychological Societyen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonPublisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© Copyright 2017 British Psychological Society
dc.titleThe clinical use of Cogmed Working Memory Training (CWMT): a clinician surveyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the British Psychological Societyen_GB
dc.identifier.journalThe Neuropsychologisten_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record