Background Most variants of negative reinforcement theory predict that acute depressed
mood can promote alcohol-seeking behaviour, but the precise mechanisms underpinning this
effect remain contested. One possibility is that mood-induced alcohol-seeking is due to the
formation of a stimulus-response (S-R) association, enabling ...
Background Most variants of negative reinforcement theory predict that acute depressed
mood can promote alcohol-seeking behaviour, but the precise mechanisms underpinning this
effect remain contested. One possibility is that mood-induced alcohol-seeking is due to the
formation of a stimulus-response (S-R) association, enabling depressed mood to elicit
alcohol-seeking automatically. A second possibility is that depressed mood undergoes
incentive learning, enabling it to enhance the expected value of alcohol and thus promote
goal-directed alcohol-seeking. Objectives These two explanations were distinguished using a
human outcome-revaluation procedure. Methods One hundred and twenty eight alcohol
drinkers completed questionnaires of alcohol use disorder, drinking to cope with negative
affect and depression symptoms. Participants then learned that two responses earned alcohol
and food points respectively (baseline) in two-alternative forced-choice trials. At test,
participants rated the valence of randomly sampled negative and positive mood statements
and, after each statement, chose between the alcohol- or food-seeking response in extinction.
Results The percentage of alcohol- vs. food-seeking responses was increased significantly in
trials containing negative statements compared to baseline and positive statement trials, in
individuals who reported drinking to cope with negative affect (p=.004), but there was no
such interaction with indices of alcohol use disorder (p=.87) or depression symptoms (p=.58).
Conclusions: Individuals who drink to cope with negative affect are more sensitive to the
motivational impact of acute depressed mood statements priming goal-directed alcoholseeking.
Negative copers’ vulnerability to alcohol dependence may be better explained by
excessive affective incentive learning than by S-R habit formation.