Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorClare, L
dc.contributor.authorTeale, JC
dc.contributor.authorToms, G
dc.contributor.authorKudlicka, A
dc.contributor.authorEvans, I
dc.contributor.authorAbrahams, S
dc.contributor.authorGoldstein, LH
dc.contributor.authorHindle, JV
dc.contributor.authorHo, AK
dc.contributor.authorJahanshahi, M
dc.contributor.authorLangdon, D
dc.contributor.authorMorris, R
dc.contributor.authorSnowden, JS
dc.contributor.authorDavies, R
dc.contributor.authorMarkova, I
dc.contributor.authorBusse, M
dc.contributor.authorThompson-Coon, J
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-15T11:03:49Z
dc.date.issued2018-11-08
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Despite their potentially significant impact, cognitive disability may be overlooked in a number of progressive neurodegenerative conditions, as other difficulties dominate the clinical picture. OBJECTIVE: We examined the extent, nature and range of the research evidence relating to cognitive rehabilitation, self-management, psychotherapeutic and caregiver support interventions in Parkinsonian disorders, multiple sclerosis (MS), frontotemporal dementias (FTD), motor neuron disease and Huntington’s disease. METHODS: Scoping review based on searches of MEDLINE and CINAHL up to 15 March 2016. RESULTS: We included 140 eligible papers. Over half of the studies, and almost all the randomised controlled trials, related to MS, while a number of single case studies described interventions for people with FTD. CR interventions addressed functional ability, communication and interaction, behaviour or memory. The majority of psychotherapy interventions involved cognitive behavioural therapy for depression or anxiety. Self-management interventions were mainly available for people with MS. There were few reports of interventions specific to caregivers. Numerous methodological challenges were identified. CONCLUSIONS: The limited range of studies for all conditions except MS suggests a need firstly to synthesise systematically the available evidence across conditions and secondly to develop well-designed studies to provide evidence about the effectiveness of CR and other psychological interventions.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAK acknowledges support from the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment (HTA) programme; PI Professor L Clare; HTA reference 11/15/04. LHG acknowledges that this paper represents independent research part-funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Dementia Biomedical Research Unit at South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust and King’s College Londonen_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 08 November 2018.en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.3233/NRE-172353
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32120
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherIOS Pressen_GB
dc.rights© 2018 – IOS Press and the authors. All rights reserved.
dc.subjectParkinson’s diseaseen_GB
dc.subjectmultiple sclerosisen_GB
dc.subjectfrontotemporal dementiaen_GB
dc.subjectmotor neuron diseaseen_GB
dc.subjectHuntington’s diseaseen_GB
dc.subjectself-managementen_GB
dc.subjectpsychotherapyen_GB
dc.subjectcaregiveren_GB
dc.titleCognitive rehabilitation, self-management, psychotherapeutic and caregiver support interventions in progressive neurodegenerative conditions: a scoping reviewen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.identifier.issn1053-8135
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from IOS Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalNeuroRehabilitationen_GB
refterms.dateFOA2018-12-12T10:51:30Z


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record