Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHogarth, L
dc.contributor.authorHardy, L
dc.date.accessioned2018-04-16T11:00:31Z
dc.date.accessioned2018-05-11T10:10:57Z
dc.date.issued2018-05-09
dc.description.abstractRationale: Alcohol dependence is characterised by persistent drinking despite health, social and economic costs. Behavioural economics has proposed two explanations for the persistence of alcohol use despite costs. Dependent individuals may (a) ascribe excessively high value to alcohol, such that costs associated with alcohol are exceeded, and/or (b) they may discount (neglect) the costs associated with alcohol. Methods: To test these predictions, the current study recruited 127 student drinkers who reported varied alcohol use disorder symptom severity in the Alcohol Use Disorders Inventory Test (AUDIT; mean=11.17, 69% above the hazardous cutoff). Participants made concurrent forced choices between alcohol and food points under conditions that manipulated the magnitude of points (1, 2 or 3) and the delay to receive points (0 or 3 seconds). Alcohol value was indexed by preferential choice of alcohol versus food points, whereas sensitivity to costs was indexed by the decrease in alcohol choice when food points were of greater magnitude (sensitivity to opportunity costs) and when alcohol points were delayed (sensitivity to delay costs). Results: Percent choice of alcohol over food varied consistently with the relative magnitude of points offered (p<.001) and with time delays imposed on these rewards (p<.001). AUDIT scores were associated with greater alcohol versus food choice across all conditions (p=.001). As alcohol use disorder symptom severity increased, the sensitivity of alcohol choice to the relative magnitude of points (p=.29) and time delays (p=.62) remained unchanged, suggesting no differential discounting of opportunity or delay costs imposed on alcohol. In contrasts of AUDIT categories, there was comparable sensitivity to costs across groups defined as low-risk (N=39), hazardous (n=57), harmful (n=20) and possible dependent drinkers (n=11). Conclusions: Alcohol use disorder symptom severity is associated with greater relative value ascribed to alcohol, but not with greater discounting of opportunity or delay costs imposed on alcohol. Despite limitations of the current study, it may be concluded that cost discounting plays a lesser role in dependence than previously thought.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was supported by an Alcohol Research UK grant (RS17/03) to Lee Hogarth and an ESRC PhD scholarship to Lorna Hardyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationFirst Online: 09 May 2018en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00213-018-4922-8
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/32795
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.en_GB
dc.subjectAlcohol use disorder symptomsen_GB
dc.subjectRelative valueen_GB
dc.subjectCost discountingen_GB
dc.subjectConcurrent choiceen_GB
dc.titleAlcohol use disorder symptoms are associated with greater relative value ascribed to alcohol, but not greater discounting of costs imposed on alcoholen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-05-11T10:10:57Z
dc.identifier.issn0033-3158
dc.descriptionThis is the final version of the article. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPsychopharmacologyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record