Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDirks, ML
dc.contributor.authorWall, BT
dc.contributor.authorSnijders, T
dc.contributor.authorOttenbros, CLP
dc.contributor.authorVerdijk, LB
dc.contributor.authorvan Loon, LJC
dc.date.accessioned2018-10-11T12:32:12Z
dc.date.issued2013-11-20
dc.description.abstractAIM: Short periods of muscle disuse, due to illness or injury, result in substantial skeletal muscle atrophy. Recently, we have shown that a single session of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) increases muscle protein synthesis rates. The aim was to investigate the capacity for daily NMES to attenuate muscle atrophy during short-term muscle disuse. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy, young (23 ± 1 year) males participated in the present study. Volunteers were subjected to 5 days of one-legged knee immobilization with (NMES; n = 12) or without (CON; n = 12) supervised NMES sessions (40-min sessions, twice daily). Two days prior to and immediately after the immobilization period, CT scans and single-leg one-repetition maximum (1RM) strength tests were performed to assess quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and leg muscle strength respectively. Furthermore, muscle biopsies were taken to assess muscle fibre CSA, satellite cell content and mRNA and protein expression of selected genes. RESULTS: In CON, immobilization reduced quadriceps CSA by 3.5 ± 0.5% (P < 0.0001) and muscle strength by 9 ± 2% (P < 0.05). In contrast, no significant muscle loss was detected following immobilization in NMES although strength declined by 7 ± 3% (P < 0.05). Muscle MAFbx and MuRF1 mRNA expression increased following immobilization in CON (P < 0.001 and P = 0.07 respectively), whereas levels either declined (P < 0.01) or did not change in NMES, respectively. Immobilization led to an increase in muscle myostatin mRNA expression in CON (P < 0.05), but remained unchanged in NMES. CONCLUSION: During short-term disuse, NMES represents an effective interventional strategy to prevent the loss of muscle mass, but it does not allow preservation of muscle strength. NMES during disuse may be of important clinical relevance in both health and disease.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 210 (3), pp. 628 - 641en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/apha.12200
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/34257
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWiley for Scandinavian Physiological Societyen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24251881en_GB
dc.rights© 2013 Scandinavian Physiological Society. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltden_GB
dc.subjectdisuse atrophyen_GB
dc.subjectimmobilizationen_GB
dc.subjectneuromuscular electrical stimulationen_GB
dc.subjectskeletal muscleen_GB
dc.subjectElectric Stimulation Therapyen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectKnee Jointen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMuscle Strengthen_GB
dc.subjectMuscular Atrophyen_GB
dc.subjectQuadriceps Muscleen_GB
dc.subjectRestraint, Physicalen_GB
dc.subjectYoung Adulten_GB
dc.titleNeuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle disuse atrophy during leg immobilization in humansen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2018-10-11T12:32:12Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalActa Physiologicaen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record