Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEngland, CY
dc.contributor.authorThompson, JL
dc.contributor.authorJago, R
dc.contributor.authorCooper, AR
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, RC
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T10:55:46Z
dc.date.issued2016-09-09
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Dietary advice is fundamental in the prevention and management of type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Advice is improved by individual assessment but existing methods are time-consuming and require expertise. We developed a twenty-five-item questionnaire, the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire (UKDDQ), for quick assessment of an individual's diet. The present study examined the UKDDQ's repeatability and relative validity compared with 4 d food diaries. DESIGN: The UKDDQ was completed twice with a median 3 d gap (interquartile range=1-7 d) between tests. A 4 d food diary was completed after the second UKDDQ. Diaries were analysed and food groups were mapped on to the UKDDQ. Absolute agreement between total scores was examined using intra-class correlation (ICC). Agreement for individual items was tested with Cohen's weighted kappa (κ w). SETTING: South West of England. SUBJECTS: Adults (n 177, 50·3 % women) with, or at high risk for, T2DM; mean age 55·8 (sd 8·6) years, mean BMI 34·4 (sd 7·3) kg/m2; participants were 91 % White British. RESULTS: The UKDDQ showed excellent repeatability (ICC=0·90 (0·82, 0·94)). For individual items, κ w ranged from 0·43 ('savoury pastries') to 0·87 ('vegetables'). Total scores from the UKDDQ and food diaries compared well (ICC=0·54 (0·27, 0·70)). Agreement for individual items varied and was good for 'alcohol' (κ w=0·71) and 'breakfast cereals' (κ w=0·70), with no agreement for 'vegetables' (κ w=0·08) or 'savoury pastries' (κ w=0·09). CONCLUSIONS: The UKDDQ is a new British dietary questionnaire with excellent repeatability. Comparisons with food diaries found agreements similar to those for international dietary questionnaires currently in use. It targets foods and habits important in diabetes prevention and management.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipAvon Primary Care Research Collaborativeen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 20, pp. 191 - 199en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1017/S1368980016002275
dc.identifier.grantnumberClinical Doctoral Research Fellowship (number 10-017)en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberBiomedical Research Unit in Nutrition, Diet and Lifestyle at University Hospitals Bristol NHS Foundation Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/35638
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherCambridge University Pressen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27609314en_GB
dc.rights© The Authors 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.en_GB
dc.subjectBrief questionnaireen_GB
dc.subjectDiabetesen_GB
dc.subjectDietary assessmenten_GB
dc.subjectValidationen_GB
dc.subjectAdulten_GB
dc.subjectAgeden_GB
dc.subjectDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2en_GB
dc.subjectDiet Recordsen_GB
dc.subjectDiet Surveysen_GB
dc.subjectFemaleen_GB
dc.subjectGlucose Intoleranceen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectMaleen_GB
dc.subjectMiddle Ageden_GB
dc.subjectReproducibility of Resultsen_GB
dc.subjectSurveys and Questionnairesen_GB
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.titleDevelopment of a brief, reliable and valid diet assessment tool for impaired glucose tolerance and diabetes: the UK Diabetes and Diet Questionnaire.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-01-30T10:55:46Z
dc.identifier.issn1368-9800
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final published version. Available from Cambridge University Press via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPublic Health Nutritionen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-07-20
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-07-20
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-01-30T10:39:02Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-01-30T10:55:49Z
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Authors 2016
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Authors 2016 This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.