Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoulman, KD
dc.contributor.authorHopkins, J
dc.contributor.authorBrookes, ST
dc.contributor.authorChalmers, K
dc.contributor.authorMain, B
dc.contributor.authorOwen-Smith, A
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, RC
dc.contributor.authorByrne, J
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, JL
dc.contributor.authorMazza, G
dc.contributor.authorReeves, BC
dc.contributor.authorRogers, CA
dc.contributor.authorThompson, JL
dc.contributor.authorWelbourn, R
dc.contributor.authorWordsworth, S
dc.contributor.authorBlazeby, JM
dc.contributor.authorBARIACT working group
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T11:10:03Z
dc.date.issued2016-11-29
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Bariatric and metabolic surgery is used as a treatment for patients with severe and complex obesity. However, there is a need to improve outcome selection and reporting in bariatric surgery trials. A Core Outcome Set (COS), an agreed minimum set of outcomes reported in all studies of a specific condition, may achieve this. Here, we present the development of a COS for BARIAtric and metabolic surgery Clinical Trials-the BARIACT Study. METHODS AND FINDINGS: Outcomes identified from systematic reviews and patient interviews informed a questionnaire survey. Patients and health professionals were surveyed three times and asked to rate the importance of each item on a 1-9 scale. Delphi methods provided anonymised feedback to participants. Items not meeting predefined criteria were discarded between rounds. Remaining items were discussed at consensus meetings, held separately with patients and professionals, where the COS was agreed. Data sources identified 2,990 outcomes, which were used to develop a 130-item questionnaire. Round 1 response rates were moderate but subsequently improved to above 75% for other rounds. After rounds 2 and 3, 81 and 14 items were discarded, respectively, leaving 35 items for discussion at consensus meetings. The final COS included nine items: "weight," "diabetes status," "cardiovascular risk," "overall quality of life (QOL)," "mortality," "technical complications of the specific operation," "any re-operation/re-intervention," "dysphagia/regurgitation," and "micronutrient status." The main limitation of this study was that it was based in the United Kingdom only. CONCLUSIONS: The COS is recommended to be used as a minimum in all trials of bariatric and metabolic surgery. Adoption of the COS will improve data synthesis and the value of research data. Future work will establish methods for the measurement of the outcomes in the COS.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMedical Research Council (MRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13 (11), article e1002187en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pmed.1002187
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/K025643/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberDoctoral Research Fellowshipen_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberHealth Technology Assessment Programmeen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/35640
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27898680en_GB
dc.rights© 2016 Coulman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: This article summarizes ien_GB
dc.subjectAttitude of Health Personnelen_GB
dc.subjectAttitude to Healthen_GB
dc.subjectBariatric Surgeryen_GB
dc.subjectHumansen_GB
dc.subjectPatientsen_GB
dc.subjectSurgeonsen_GB
dc.subjectUnited Kingdomen_GB
dc.titleA Core Outcome Set for the Benefits and Adverse Events of Bariatric and Metabolic Surgery: The BARIACT Project.en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-01-30T11:10:03Z
dc.identifier.issn1549-1277
exeter.place-of-publicationUnited Statesen_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from PLoS via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS Medicineen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-11-29
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-11-29
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-01-30T11:06:53Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-01-30T11:10:06Z
refterms.panelUnspecifieden_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2016 Coulman et al. This is an open
access article distributed under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution License, which
permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided the original
author and source are credited.
Funding: This article summarizes i
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2016 Coulman et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funding: This article summarizes i