Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorParamasivan, S
dc.contributor.authorRogers, CA
dc.contributor.authorWelbourn, R
dc.contributor.authorByrne, JP
dc.contributor.authorSalter, N
dc.contributor.authorMahon, D
dc.contributor.authorNoble, H
dc.contributor.authorKelly, J
dc.contributor.authorMazza, G
dc.contributor.authorWhybrow, P
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, RC
dc.contributor.authorWilson, C
dc.contributor.authorBlazeby, JM
dc.contributor.authorDonovan, JL
dc.date.accessioned2019-01-30T12:08:51Z
dc.date.issued2017-07-03
dc.description.abstractBACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving surgical procedures are challenging for recruitment and infrequent in the specialty of bariatrics. The pilot phase of the By-Band-Sleeve study (gastric bypass versus gastric band versus sleeve gastrectomy) provided the opportunity for an investigation of recruitment using a qualitative research integrated in trials (QuinteT) recruitment intervention (QRI). PATIENTS/METHODS: The QRI investigated recruitment in two centers in the pilot phase comparing bypass and banding, through the analysis of 12 in-depth staff interviews, 84 audio recordings of patient consultations, 19 non-participant observations of consultations and patient screening data. QRI findings were developed into a plan of action and fed back to centers to improve information provision and recruitment organization. RESULTS: Recruitment proved to be extremely difficult with only two patients recruited during the first 2 months. The pivotal issue in Center A was that an effective and established clinical service could not easily adapt to the needs of the RCT. There was little scope to present RCT details or ensure efficient eligibility assessment, and recruiters struggled to convey equipoise. Following presentation of QRI findings, recruitment in Center A increased from 9% in the first 2 months (2/22) to 40% (26/65) in the 4 months thereafter. Center B, commencing recruitment 3 months after Center A, learnt from the emerging issues in Center A and set up a special clinic for trial recruitment. The trial successfully completed pilot recruitment and progressed to the main phase across 11 centers. CONCLUSIONS: The QRI identified key issues that enabled the integration of the trial into the clinical setting. This contributed to successful recruitment in the By-Band-Sleeve trial-currently the largest in bariatric practice-and offers opportunities to optimize recruitment in other trials in bariatrics.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Programmeen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipMedical Research Council (MRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 41, pp. 1654 - 1661en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1038/ijo.2017.153
dc.identifier.grantnumberHTA – 09/127/53en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberMR/K025643/1en_GB
dc.identifier.otherijo2017153
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/35645
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Natureen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28669987en_GB
dc.rights© 2017 The Author(s). Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dc.titleEnabling recruitment success in bariatric surgical trials: pilot phase of the By-Band-Sleeve studyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-01-30T12:08:51Z
exeter.place-of-publicationEnglanden_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Nature via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability: The data (transcripts) that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available because of them containing information that could compromise privacy/consent, but the authors will be able to consider specific requests on a case-by-case basis.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalInternational Journal of Obesityen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-06-21
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2017-06-21
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-01-30T12:05:41Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-01-30T12:08:54Z
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2017 The Author(s). Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2017 The Author(s). Open access. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if the material is not included under the Creative Commons license, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to reproduce the material. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/