The Material-Weight Illusion disappears or inverts in objects made of two materials
Paulun, VC; Buckingham, G; Goodale, MA; et al.Fleming, RW
Date: 23 January 2019
Journal
Journal of Neurophysiology
Publisher
American Physiological Society
Publisher DOI
Related links
Abstract
The Material-Weight Illusion (MWI) occurs when an object that looks heavy (e.g. stone) and one that looks light (e.g. Styrofoam) have the same mass. When such stimuli are lifted, the heavier-looking object feels lighter than the lighter-looking object, presumably because well-learned priors about the density of different materials are ...
The Material-Weight Illusion (MWI) occurs when an object that looks heavy (e.g. stone) and one that looks light (e.g. Styrofoam) have the same mass. When such stimuli are lifted, the heavier-looking object feels lighter than the lighter-looking object, presumably because well-learned priors about the density of different materials are violated. We examined whether a similar illusion occurs when a certain weight distribution is expected (such as the metal end of a hammer being heavier), but weight is uniformly distributed. In Experiment 1, participants lifted bipartite objects that appeared to be made of two materials (combinations of stone, Styrofoam, wood) but were manipulated to have a uniform weight distribution. Most participants experienced an inverted MWI (i.e., the heavier-looking side felt heavier), suggesting an integration of incoming sensory information with density priors. However, a replication of the classic MWI was found when the objects appeared to be uniformly made of just one of the materials (Experiment 2). Both illusions seemed to be independent of the forces used when lifting the objects. When lifting bipartite objects, but asked to judge the weight of the whole object, participants experienced no illusion (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4 we investigated weight perception in objects with a non-uniform weight distribution and again found evidence for an integration of prior and sensory information. Taken together, our seemingly contradictory results challenge most theories about the MWI. However, Bayesian integration of competing density priors with the likelihood of incoming sensory information may explain the opposing illusions.
Sport and Health Sciences
Collections of Former Colleges
Item views 0
Full item downloads 0