Introduction: We evaluated the reporting competency of radiographers providing preliminary clinical evaluations (PCE) for intraluminal pathology of computed tomography colonography (CTC). Method: Following validation of a suitable tool, audit was undertaken to compare radiographer PCE against radiology reports. A database was designed ...
Introduction: We evaluated the reporting competency of radiographers providing preliminary clinical evaluations (PCE) for intraluminal pathology of computed tomography colonography (CTC). Method: Following validation of a suitable tool, audit was undertaken to compare radiographer PCE against radiology reports. A database was designed to capture radiographer and radiologist report data. The radiographer's PCE of intraluminal pathology was given a score, the “pathology discrepancy and significance” (PDS) score based on the pathology present, any discrepancy between the PCE and the final report, and the significance of that discrepancy on the management of the patient. Agreement was assessed using percentage agreement and Kappa coefficient. Significant discrepancies between findings were compared against endoscopy and pathology reports. Results: There was agreement or insignificant discrepancy between the radiographer PCE and the radiology report for 1736 patients, representing 97.0% of cases. There was a significant discrepancy between findings in 2.8% of cases and a major discrepancy recorded for 0.2% of cases. There was a 98.4% agreement in the 229 cases where significant pathologies were present. Conclusion: From a database of 1815 studies acquired over three years and representing work done in a clinical environment, this study indicates a potential for trained radiographers to provide a PCE of intraluminal pathology.
