Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGiubilini, A
dc.contributor.authorCaviola, L
dc.contributor.authorMaslen, H
dc.contributor.authorDouglas, T
dc.contributor.authorNussberger, AM
dc.contributor.authorFaber, N
dc.contributor.authorVanderslott, S
dc.contributor.authorLoving, S
dc.contributor.authorHarrison, M
dc.contributor.authorSavulescu, J
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-27T10:31:21Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-12
dc.description.abstractMany parents are hesitant about, or face motivational barriers to, vaccinating their children. In this paper we propose a type of vaccination policy that could be implemented either in addition to coercive vaccination or as an alternative to it in order to increase paediatric vaccination uptake in a non-coercive way. We propose the use of vaccination nudges that exploit the very same decision biases that often undermine vaccination uptake. In particular, we propose a policy under which children would be vaccinated at school or day-care by default, without requiring parental authorization, but with parents retaining the right to opt their children out of vaccination. We show that such a policy is 1) likely to be effective, at least in cases in which non-vaccination is due to practical obstacles, rather than to strong beliefs about vaccines, 2) ethically acceptable and less controversial than some alternatives, because it is not coercive and affects individual autonomy only in a morally unproblematic way, and 3) likely to receive support from the UK public, on the basis of original empirical research we have conducted on the lay public.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 31 (4), pp. 325–344en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10730-019-09383-7
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/38924
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSpringer Verlagen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
dc.subjectVaccinationen_GB
dc.subjectnudgingen_GB
dc.subjectvaccination policiesen_GB
dc.subjectschool vaccinationen_GB
dc.subjectanti-vaxxersen_GB
dc.titleNudging immunity: the case for opt out vaccination of children in school and day careen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-09-27T10:31:21Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Springer Verlag via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1572-8498
dc.identifier.journalHEC Forumen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-09-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-09-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-09-26T18:35:42Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2019. Open Access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.