Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorEllmers, TJ
dc.contributor.authorMachado, G
dc.contributor.authorWong, TWL
dc.contributor.authorZhu, F
dc.contributor.authorWilliams, AM
dc.contributor.authorYoung, WR
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-30T12:04:07Z
dc.date.issued2016-10-01
dc.description.abstractPostural threat can induce conscious involvement in movement control. This internal focus has been implicated in compromising attentional processing efficiency during postural control, leading to behavioral adaptations that might increase the risk of falling in the elderly. It is suggested that electroencephalography (EEG) coherence, or ‘communication’, between T3 (verbal-analytical) and Fz (motor-planning) regions may provide an objective measure of internal focus in learned movement skills. However, it is currently unknown whether this experimental technique can be applied to the control of gait and posture; skills which develop early in life, without the use of declarative knowledge/explicit verbal cues to guide performance. We validate the utility of the EEG T3-Fz coherence analysis in a postural task. A total of 24 young adults produced small voluntary swaying movements in medial-lateral or anterior-posterior direction under conditions that directed their attentional focus either internally or externally. Although EEG coherence was sensitive to voluntary changes in attentional focus, the lack of observed between-group (High/Low-trait-reinvestment) difference in coherence may suggest that younger adults cannot be assumed to utilize explicit verbal cues to control voluntary postural sway unless explicitly instructed to do so. As a result, while these results indicate that EEG T3-Fz is a valid technique for assessing attentional focus in postural tasks, our data do not support the clinical application of this method of analysis in providing an objective indication of trait-reinvestment in tasks involving voluntary postural sway.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipRoyal Societyen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 50, pp. 229 - 231en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.gaitpost.2016.09.001
dc.identifier.grantnumberIE131576en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberSG132820en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/38969
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights(C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectAttentional focusen_GB
dc.subjectReinvestmenten_GB
dc.subjectPostural controlen_GB
dc.subjectT3-Fz EEG coherenceen_GB
dc.titleA validation of neural co-activation as a measure of attentional focus in a postural tasken_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2019-09-30T12:04:07Z
dc.identifier.issn0966-6362
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalGait and Postureen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2016-09-01
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2016-10-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2019-09-30T12:00:24Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2019-09-30T12:04:10Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

(C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND
license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as (C) 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).