Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhazanov, GK
dc.contributor.authorXu, C
dc.contributor.authorDunn, BD
dc.contributor.authorCohen, ZD
dc.contributor.authorDeRubeis, RJ
dc.contributor.authorHollon, SD
dc.date.accessioned2020-01-22T09:59:23Z
dc.date.issued2019-10-31
dc.description.abstractTwo core features of depression include depressed mood (heightened distress) and anhedonia (reduced pleasure). Despite their centrality to depression, studies have not examined their contribution to treatment outcomes in a randomized clinical trial providing mainstream treatments like antidepressant medications (ADM) and cognitive therapy (CT). We used baseline distress and anhedonia derived from a factor analysis of the Mood and Anxiety Symptom Questionnaire to predict remission and recovery in 433 individuals with recurrent/chronic major depressive disorder. Patients were provided with only ADM or both ADM and CT. Overall, higher baseline distress and anhedonia predicted longer times to remission within one year and recovery within three years. When controlling for treatment condition, distress improved prediction of outcomes over and above anhedonia, while anhedonia did not improve prediction of outcomes over and above distress. Interactions with treatment condition demonstrated that individuals with higher distress and anhedonia benefited from receiving CT in addition to ADM, whereas there was no added benefit of CT for individuals with lower distress and anhedonia. Assessing distress and anhedonia prior to treatment may help select patients who will benefit most from CT in addition to ADM. For the treatments and outcome measures tested, utilizing distress to guide treatment planning may yield the greatest benefit. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00057577.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute of Mental Healthen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 125, article 103507en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.brat.2019.103507
dc.identifier.grantnumberMH60713en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberMH01697en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberMH60998en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/40532
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 31 October 2021 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectDistressen_GB
dc.subjectAnhedoniaen_GB
dc.subjectMASQen_GB
dc.subjectDepressionen_GB
dc.subjectTreatment outcomeen_GB
dc.titleDistress and anhedonia as predictors of depression treatment outcome: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-01-22T09:59:23Z
dc.identifier.issn0005-7967
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBehaviour Research and Therapyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-10-28
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-02-01
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-01-22T09:44:17Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/