Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCoffee, P
dc.contributor.authorRees, T
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-24T11:26:13Z
dc.date.issued2008-11
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study examined main effects of controllability and interactive effects of controllability and generalisability attributions upon self-efficacy.Design: A cross-sectional study design was employed with pre-competition self-efficacy assessed at least one week prior to attributions and subsequent self-efficacy.Method: Participants (N = 360; mean age 21.64, SD = 6.96 years) completed measures of pre-competition self-efficacy (1 h prior to competition 1), attributions (1 h after competition 1) and subsequent self-efficacy (at least one week following competition 1 and 1 h prior to competition 2). All measures were completed in reference to sport competitions.Results: Demographic variables and pre-competition self-efficacy were entered as control variables in moderated hierarchical regression analyses. Results demonstrated that individuals who perceived performance as more successful, had higher subsequent self-efficacy when they generalised (Delta R-2 =.34, p<.01) causes of performance across time (stability: b =.44, p<.01), and/or across situations (globality: b =.47, p <.01), and/or perceived causes to be unique to themselves (universality: b = -.45, p<.01). Individuals who perceived performance as less successful, had higher subsequent selfefficacy when they viewed causes of performance as controllable (Delta R-2 =.08, b =.23, p<.01); an interaction (Delta R-2 =.06, p <.05) for controllability and globality (b =.20, p<.01) demonstrated that if causes were perceived to be global, higher levels of controllability were associated with higher levels of subsequent self-efficacy.Conclusion: This study provides evidence, following more Successful performances, that attributions to generalisability (stability, globality and universality) affect self-efficacy; following less successful performances, globality (a generalisability dimension) moderates the effect of con troll ability upon self-efficacy. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPsychology of Sport and Exercise , 2008, Vol. 9, Issue 6, pp. 775 - 785en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.12.002
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/9625
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.subjectPERFORMANCEen_GB
dc.subjectSPORTen_GB
dc.subjectSTABILITYen_GB
dc.subjectModelen_GB
dc.subjectFAILUREen_GB
dc.subjectSPORT PSYCHOLOGYen_GB
dc.subjectmoderated hierarchical regressionen_GB
dc.subjectCAUSAL DIMENSION SCALEen_GB
dc.subjectSUCCESSen_GB
dc.subjectHEALTH BEHAVIOR-CHANGEen_GB
dc.subjectglobalityen_GB
dc.subjectVARIABLESen_GB
dc.subjectUNIVERSALITYen_GB
dc.titleMain and interactive effects of controllability and generalisability attributions upon self-efficacyen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2013-05-24T11:26:13Z
dc.identifier.issn1469-0292
dc.descriptionpublication-status: Publisheden_GB
dc.descriptiontypes: Articleen_GB
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2008 Elsevier. NOTICE: this is the author’s version of a work that was accepted for publication in Psychology of Sport and Exercise. Changes resulting from the publishing process, such as peer review, editing, corrections, structural formatting, and other quality control mechanisms may not be reflected in this document. Changes may have been made to this work since it was submitted for publication. A definitive version was subsequently published in Psychology of Sport and Exercise , 2008, Vol. 9, Issue 6, pp. 775 – 785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2007.12.002en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPsychology of Sport and Exerciseen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record