A Comparison of methods for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Research : Two Examples Using Meta-Ethnography and Meta-Study

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

A Comparison of methods for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Research : Two Examples Using Meta-Ethnography and Meta-Study

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Garside, Ruth en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2010-11-25T11:41:57Z en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-25T17:21:26Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-21T11:42:57Z
dc.date.issued 2008-06-18 en_GB
dc.description.abstract Systematic reviews and meta-analysis have been a central pillar of evidence-based practice and policy making in healthcare over recent years. Traditionally, this has focused on effectiveness evidence from trials. There is increasing understanding, however, that other study designs also provide essential information and this has led to interest in developing ways to review and synthesis such evidence. Qualitative research has unique potential to illuminate the patient experience. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/116289 en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.subject systematic review en_GB
dc.subject Meta-analysis en_GB
dc.subject Qualitative Research en_GB
dc.subject policy-making en_GB
dc.subject hysterectomy en_GB
dc.subject menstrual bleeding en_GB
dc.subject evidence based practice en_GB
dc.title A Comparison of methods for the Systematic Review of Qualitative Research : Two Examples Using Meta-Ethnography and Meta-Study en_GB
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_GB
dc.date.available 2010-11-25T11:41:57Z en_GB
dc.date.available 2011-01-25T17:21:26Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-21T11:42:57Z


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Garside PhD Thesis.pdf 1.601Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links