Organism and Mechanism: A Critique of Mechanistic Thinking in Biology

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Organism and Mechanism: A Critique of Mechanistic Thinking in Biology

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Nicholson, Daniel James en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2010-12-14T18:35:09Z en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-25T17:28:42Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-21T11:49:56Z
dc.date.issued 2010-09-29 en_GB
dc.description.abstract In this thesis I present a critical examination of the role played by mechanistic ideas in shaping our understanding of living systems. I draw on a combination of historical, philosophical, and scientific resources to uncover a number of problems which I take to result from the adoption of mechanistic thinking in biology. I provide an analysis of the historical development of the conflict between mechanistic and vitalistic conceptions of life since the seventeenth century, and I argue that the basic terms of this conflict remain central to current disputes over the nature of the organism as well as the question of how far the theories, concepts, and methods of physics, chemistry, and engineering can ultimately take us in the explanation of life. I offer a detailed critique of the machine conception of the organism, which constitutes the central unifying idea of mechanistic biology. I argue that this notion, despite its undeniable heuristic value, is fundamentally inadequate as a theory of the organism due to a number of basic differences between organisms and machines. Ultimately, I suggest that the neglected vitalistic tradition in biology actually possesses the best conceptual tools for coming to terms with the nature of living systems. I also undertake a philosophical analysis of the concept of mechanism in biology. I argue that the term ‘mechanism’ is actually an umbrella term for three distinct notions, which are unfortunately conflated in philosophical discussions. I explore the relation between mechanistic biology and the new philosophical interest in the concept of mechanism and I show that these two research programs have little to do with one another because each of them understands the concept of mechanism in a different way. Finally, I draw on the historical and philosophical foundations of cell theory to propose an epistemological perspective which enables the reductionistic explanation of the organism without having to give up the distinctive features of life in the process. In this way, I show this perspective to have significant advantages over the classic physicochemical reductionism of mechanistic biology. en_GB
dc.description.sponsorship Department of Sociology and Philosophy, University of Exeter. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/117787 en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher University of Exeter en_GB
dc.rights.embargoreason I wish to publish papers using material that is substantially drawn from my thesis. en_GB
dc.subject philosophy of biology en_GB
dc.subject nature of life en_GB
dc.subject organicism en_GB
dc.subject vitalism en_GB
dc.subject reductionism en_GB
dc.subject cell theory en_GB
dc.title Organism and Mechanism: A Critique of Mechanistic Thinking in Biology en_GB
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_GB
dc.date.available 2012-03-29T04:00:05Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-21T11:49:56Z
dc.contributor.advisor Moss, Lenny en_GB
dc.contributor.advisor Dupré, John en_GB
dc.publisher.department Sociology and Philosophy en_GB
dc.type.degreetitle PhD in Philosophy en_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en_GB
dc.type.qualificationname PhD en_GB


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
NicholsonD_fm.pdf 127.0Kb PDF Thumbnail
NicholsonD.pdf 1.762Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links