Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDeacon, Bernarden_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-26T15:11:09Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-26T10:36:52Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:22:27Z
dc.date.issued2003en_GB
dc.description.abstractThis article addresses a gap in the literature on nationalism, the case of Cornwall. Cornish ethnoregionalism presents a paradox; a minority nationalist movement that has sustained itself politically for more than a half a century, culturally for more than century, yet one that has achieved little electoral or policy success. It is argued here that Cornwall has been conceptualised hitherto too rigidly within one of two paradigms – as a Celtic country or as an English county. Instead, recognising this hybridity allows us to extend Lieven De Winter’s work on European ethnoregionalist parties to explain both the weakness of Cornish ethnoregionalism and its persistence, albeit at relatively low levels of activity. By investigating the Cornish case theory on ethnoregionalist parties is applied comparatively, leading to the conclusion that utilising a number of perspectives at differing scales opens out our understanding of concrete cases of minority nationalism.en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/19198en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.subjectnationalismen_GB
dc.subjectCornwallen_GB
dc.subjectethnoregionalismen_GB
dc.titleThe Cornish paradox: ethnoregionalism in a hybrid territoryen_GB
dc.typeWorking Paperen_GB
dc.date.available2008-02-26T15:11:09Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-26T10:36:52Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:22:27Z
pubs.declined2012-12-03T13:35:31.0+0000


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record