Late assignment of syntax theory: evidence from Chinese and English

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Late assignment of syntax theory: evidence from Chinese and English

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Shen, Xingjia en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2008-06-13T11:32:47Z en_GB
dc.date.accessioned 2011-01-25T16:57:41Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-21T10:54:59Z
dc.date.issued 2006-10 en_GB
dc.description.abstract The attraction of the well-structured arguments of the mental syntactic processing device (parser) in Chomsky’s theory has led to an overemphasis on syntactic processing to the exclusion of semantic and other processing in the initial sentence processing stage (Frazier & Clifton, 1996; Gibson & Hickok, 1993; Pickering & van Gompel, 2006). The current thesis joins some others (Green & Mitchell, 2006; MacDonald et al., 1994; Townsend & Bever, 2001, etc.), investigating the timecourse of the information processing of sentences. The first interest centres on ambiguous sentence resolution. Crosslinguistic studies have shown different resolutions in processing the relative clause (RC) attachment as in “the servant of the actress who was on the balcony” (Cuetos & Mitchell, 1988). Three studies confirmed that there is an NP-low preference in Chinese; however, this effect was delayed in comparison to its English counterparts. The NP-low preference can be explained by syntax-first, syntax parallel, and syntax later theories. However, the delay effect questions the traditional syntax-first theories. This leads to the second investigation of direct comparison of the timecourse of syntactic and semantic processing using anomalous materials in English and Chinese. Two experiments have confirmed that the syntactic anomaly is recognised later than semantic anomaly in both languages. The empirical investigation in the current thesis used various methodologies, including self-paced reading, a questionnaire, and eye-tracking studies, where the design of materials strictly followed linguistic principles. All the results support the late assignment of syntax theory (LAST) (Townsend & Bever, 2001). In fact, LAST can explain most of the evidence for syntax-first and syntax-parallel theories, and it is in line with the latest development of the linguistic UG theories (the Minimalist Programme). en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/30017 en_GB
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher University of Exeter en_GB
dc.rights This thesis is available for Library use on the understanding that it is copyright material and that no quotation from the thesis may be published without proper acknowledgement. I certify that all material in this thesis which is not my own work has been identified and that no material is included for which a degree has previously been conferred upon me. en_GB
dc.title Late assignment of syntax theory: evidence from Chinese and English en_GB
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_GB
dc.date.available 2008-06-13T11:32:47Z en_GB
dc.date.available 2011-01-25T16:57:41Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-21T10:54:59Z
dc.contributor.advisor Mitchell, Don en_GB
dc.publisher.department School of Psychology en_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en_GB
dc.type.qualificationname PhD en_GB


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
ShenX_fm.pdf 199.7Kb PDF Thumbnail
ShenX.pdf 4.256Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links