Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLong, Daviden_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-05-31T16:07:34Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-21T10:42:30Z
dc.date.issued2011-02-28en_GB
dc.description.abstractThe global analysis fields of the Met Office stratospheric assimilated data set have been investigated. Systematic biases for select years were identified through val- idation with independent satellite observations. Particular attention was given to analyses from January 2005 to October 2009 produced from a 50 level (L50) configuration of the UM with model lid at ∼0.1 hPa, and the impact on analyses fields from November 2009 to September 2010 when the middle atmospheric configuration of the UM was extended to ∼0.01 hPa using 70 levels (L70). Validation results from both the L50 and L70 analyses show that largest tem- perature biases occur at polar latitudes approaching the model lid in the meso- sphere, exhibiting a clear seasonal cycle. Here cold biases in the winter season of the L50 analyses and warm biases in the summer season of the L70 analyses would strongly suggest that the mean meridional circulation in the mesosphere is underestimated, and that small scale gravity wave forcing supplied by the op- erational Ultra Simple Spectral Parameterisation (USSP) scheme is insufficient. Based on the above validation results numerous experiments were conducted to investigate the temperature response in the mesosphere to increased gravity wave forcing. Such experiments concentrated on tuning the energy scale factor (β) in the USSP scheme and the application of a momentum conserving ”opaque” lid. Furthermore, the impact of developing the USSP scheme to include direct heating from gravity wave induced turbulent dissipation was also investigated. Maximum temperature responses in the summer polar upper mesosphere of ∼22 K were found when increasing the standard value of β=0.1 to β=0.14 combined with the application of an opaque lid. Magnitudes of direct heating rates due to gravity wave turbulent dissipation diagnosed via the USSP scheme were found to be consistent with previous estimates. However applying such heating would most likely have a negative impact on the L70 analyses, which already display warm biases in the upper mesosphere, strongly suggesting that additional phys- ical processes such as eddy diffusion must also be accounted for when applying direct heating from gravity wave breaking.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipGWR, Met Officeen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/3104en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectMet Office Analysesen_GB
dc.subjectMesosphereen_GB
dc.subjectGravity Wave Forcingen_GB
dc.subjectUSSP schemeen_GB
dc.subjectTurbulent Heatingen_GB
dc.titleMet Office Upper Stratospheric and Mesospheric Analaysis: Validation and Improvement of Gravity Wave Drag Schemeen_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2011-05-31T16:07:34Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-21T10:42:30Z
dc.contributor.advisorJohn, Thuburnen_GB
dc.publisher.departmentCEMPSen_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Mathematicsen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record