Corporate Default Prediction: Models, Drivers and Measurements

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Corporate Default Prediction: Models, Drivers and Measurements

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/3457

Share:                 



Title: Corporate Default Prediction: Models, Drivers and Measurements
Author: Wang, Yangzhengxuan
Advisor: Richard, Harris
Publisher: University of Exeter
Date Issued: 2011-12-12
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10036/3457
Abstract: This thesis identifies the optimal set of corporate default drivers and examines the prediction performance of corporate default measurement tools, using a sample of companies in the United States from 1970 to 2009. In the discussion of optimal default drivers, feature selection techniques including the t-test and stepwise methods are used to filter relevant default information collected from previous empirical studies. The optimal default driver information set consists of quantitative parameters from accounting ratios, market indices, macroeconomic indicators, default history, and firm age. While both accounting ratios and market information dominate the explanatory ability, followed by default history, macroeconomic indicators contribute additional explanation for default risk. Moreover, industry effects show significance across alternative models, with the retail industry presenting as the sector with highest risk. The results are robust in both traditional and advanced random models. In investigating the optimal prediction method, two newly developed random models, mixed logit and frailty model, are tested for their theoretical superiority in capturing default clusters and unobservable information for default risk. The prediction ability of both models has been improved upon using the extended optimal set of default drivers. While the mixed logit model provides better prediction accuracy and shows stability in robustness checks, the frailty model benefits from computational efficiency and explains default clusters more thoroughly. This thesis further compares the prediction performance of large dimensional models across five categories based on the default probabilities transferred from alternative results in different models. Besides the traditional assessment criteria - covering the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy ratios, and classification error rates – this thesis thoroughly evaluates forecasting performance using innovative proxies including model stability under financial crisis, profitability and misclassification costs for creditors using alternative risk measurements. The practical superiority of the two advanced random models has been verified further in the comparative study.
Type: Thesis or dissertation
Funders/Sponsor: AXA


Please note: Before reusing this item please check the rights under which it has been made available. Some items are restricted to non-commercial use. Please cite the published version where applicable.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
WangY.pdf 3.570Mb PDF View/Open
WangY_fm.pdf 82.57Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Browse

My Account

Local Links