Genomic Sovereignty and "The Mexican Genome"

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Genomic Sovereignty and "The Mexican Genome"

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Schwartz Marín, Ernesto en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-04-10T16:13:31Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-21T11:38:41Z
dc.date.issued 2011-10-18 en_US
dc.description.abstract ABSTRACT This PhD seeks to explore the development of a bio-molecular (i.e., genomic) map as a sovereign resource in Mexico. The basic analytical thread of the dissertation is related to the circulation of genomic variability through the policy/legal and scientific social worlds that compose the Mexican medical-population genomics arena. It follows the construction of the Mexican Institute of Genomic Medicine (INMEGEN), the notion of genomic sovereignty, and the Mexican Genome Diversity Project (MGDP).The key argument for the construction of the INMEGEN relied in a nationalist policy framing, which considered the Mexican genome as a sovereign resource, coupling Mexican “uniqueness” to the very nature of genomic science. Nevertheless, the notion of genomic sovereignty was nothing similar to a paradigm, and was not based on shared visions of causality, since the very “nature” of the policy object —Mexican Genome— was, and still is, a disputed reality. It was through the rhetoric upon independence, emancipation and biopiracy: i.e. experiences of dispossession “in archaeology, botany or zoology” (IFS 2001: 25) that the novelty of population genomics became amenable to be understood as a sovereign matter. Therefore, the strategic reification of Mexicanhood fuelled the whole policy and the legal agenda of the INMEGEN as well, which permitted cooperation without consensus and opened the process of policy innovation. Conversely, scientists considered genomic sovereignty an unfounded exaggeration, but anyhow they cooperated and even created a new policy and scientific enterprise. Genomic sovereignty exemplifies the process of cooperation without consensus on its most extreme version .So, as the notion circulated and gradually became a law to protect Mexican genomic patrimony, the initial coalition of scientists, lawyers and policy makers disaggregated. Many of the original members of the coalition now think of genomic sovereignty as a strategy of the INMEGEN to monopolise genomic research in the country. This dissertation additionally explores the way in which the MGDP is constructed in mass media, in INMEGEN´s communication and in the laboratory practices. These different dimensions of the MGDP depict the difficulties that emerge between the probabilistic, relative and multiple constructions of population genomics and the rhetorical strategies to continually assert the existence of the unique “Mexican Genome”. I argue that the Mexican case study provides an entry point to what I and others (Benjamin 2009; Schwartz-Marin 2011) have identified as a postcolonial biopolitics in which the nation state is reasserted rather than diluted. However the relation between sovereignty, race and nation is not mediated by the biological purification of the nation (Agamben 1998; Foucault 2007), or the active participation of citizens looking to increase their vitality (Rose 2008, Rose & Rabinow 2006), but on an awareness of subalternity in the genomic arena and a collective desire to compete in the biomedical global economy. en_GB
dc.description.sponsorship CONACYT en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumber 206788 en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/3500 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher University of Exeter en_GB
dc.subject Genomic Sovereignty en_GB
dc.subject Biopolitics en_GB
dc.subject Mexican Nationalism en_GB
dc.subject INMEGEN en_GB
dc.subject Population Genomics en_GB
dc.subject Science & Technology Studies en_GB
dc.subject Race & Genomics en_GB
dc.title Genomic Sovereignty and "The Mexican Genome" en_GB
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_GB
dc.date.available 2012-04-10T16:13:31Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-21T11:38:41Z
dc.contributor.advisor Kelly, Susan en_US
dc.contributor.advisor Pickering, Andrew en_US
dc.publisher.department Sociology and Philosophy en_GB
dc.type.degreetitle PhD in Genomics in Society en_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en_GB
dc.type.qualificationname PhD en_GB


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
SchwartzMarinE_fm.pdf 365.7Kb PDF View/Open Front Matter
SchwartzMarinE.pdf 6.377Mb PDF View/Open Full Text of Thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links