Is the machinery of local policing delivery seen as fit for purpose by practitioners and community members to anticipate and mitigate the risk of harmful radicalisation at street level?

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

Is the machinery of local policing delivery seen as fit for purpose by practitioners and community members to anticipate and mitigate the risk of harmful radicalisation at street level?

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Gale, James Robert en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2012-05-04T13:04:46Z en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2013-03-21T11:49:25Z
dc.date.issued 2012-02-23 en_US
dc.description.abstract This thesis achieves four objectives. Firstly, it adds to the existing knowledge of radicalisation: it discusses the concept, and contextualises it within other forms of social phenomena such as drug-related crime. Secondly, it proposes a menu of indicators which predict or forewarn of the risk of radicalisation. Thirdly, it establishes perceptions of success at street level of modern local policing methods, namely Neighbourhood Policing and the National Intelligence Model, at identifying risk. Fourthly, it establishes a ‘toolkit’ of options which might be used by practitioners to ‘switch-off’ the radicalisation process. I argue that urban unrest, radicalisation and terrorism share common roots, with a number of key social pre-conditions existing prior to their onset: a sense of injustice, a lack of political representation, declining perceptions of legitimacy in state authorities, relative deprivation, (which may include unemployment, and a gap between expectation and achievement), discrimination and high levels of drug related crime, and I thus propose a theoretical ladder of escalation. I critically analyse policy responses arising from five seminal events, and I isolate five ‘critical success factors’ from them, suggesting that the problem in general terms is a failure to implement these success factors, thus contributing to the crisis. I revisit ‘tension indicators’ first developed following urban unrest in 1960’s America, and I link them to the critical success factors and the common roots theory. Using quantitative and qualitative primary data which consists largely of face-to-face interviews with community members, police officers, council workers and others involved in the interaction between the state and communities at street level in Oldham, Greater Manchester, I test these proposals and their links. I conclude that Neighbourhood Policing is largely successful; however the National Intelligence Model is flawed in its ability to deliver risk mitigation in this context. en_GB
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/10036/3522 en_US
dc.language.iso en en_GB
dc.publisher University of Exeter en_GB
dc.subject Policing en_GB
dc.title Is the machinery of local policing delivery seen as fit for purpose by practitioners and community members to anticipate and mitigate the risk of harmful radicalisation at street level? en_GB
dc.type Thesis or dissertation en_GB
dc.date.available 2012-05-04T13:04:46Z en_US
dc.date.available 2013-03-21T11:49:25Z
dc.contributor.advisor Tupman, William en_US
dc.publisher.department Politics en_GB
dc.type.degreetitle PhD in Politics en_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevel Doctoral en_GB
dc.type.qualificationname PhD en_GB


Files in this item

Files Size Format View Description
GaleJ_fm.pdf 230.3Kb PDF View/Open Front Matter
GaleJ.pdf 2.217Mb PDF View/Open Full Text of Thesis

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Browse

My Account

Local Links