Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGratwicke, Brianen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMills, Judyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorDutton, Adamen_GB
dc.contributor.authorGabriel, Graceen_GB
dc.contributor.authorLong, Barneyen_GB
dc.contributor.authorSeidensticker, Johnen_GB
dc.contributor.authorWright, Belindaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorYou, Wangen_GB
dc.contributor.authorZhang, Lien_GB
dc.contributor.authorTregenza, Tomen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-28T19:35:49Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:46:51Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:47:30Z
dc.date.issued2008-07-02en_GB
dc.description.abstractA heated debate has recently emerged between tiger farmers and conservationists about the potential consequences of lifting the ban on trade in farmed tiger products in China. This debate has caused unfounded speculation about the extent of the potential market for tiger products. To fill this knowledge gap, we surveyed 1880 residents from a total of six Chinese cities to understand Urban Chinese tiger consumption behavior, knowledge of trade issues and attitudes towards tiger conservation. We found that 43% of respondents had consumed some product alleged to contain tiger parts. Within this user-group, 71% said that they preferred wild products over farmed ones. The two predominant products used were tiger bone plasters (38%) and tiger bone wine (6.4%). 88% of respondents knew that it was illegal to buy or sell tiger products, and 93% agreed that a ban in trade of tiger parts was necessary to conserve wild tigers. These results indicate that while Urban Chinese people are generally supportive of tiger conservation, there is a huge residual demand for tiger products that could resurge if the ban on trade in tiger parts is lifted in China. We suspect that the current supply of the market is predominantly met by fakes or substitutes branded as tiger medicines, but not listing tiger as an ingredient. We suggest that the Traditional Chinese Medicine community should consider re-branding these products as bone-healing medicines in order to reduce the residual demand for real tiger parts over the long-term. The lifting of the current ban on trade in farmed tiger parts may cause a surge in demand for wild tiger parts that consumers say are better. Because of the low input costs associated with poaching, wild-sourced parts would consistently undercut the prices of farmed tigers that could easily be laundered on a legal market. We therefore recommend that the Chinese authorities maintain the ban on trade in tiger parts, and work to improve the enforcement of the existing ban.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 2008 3(7)en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0002544en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/38237en_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.rightsThis is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.en_GB
dc.titleAttitudes Toward Consumption and Conservation of Tigers in Chinaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-07-02en_GB
dc.date.available2008-09-28T19:35:49Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:46:51Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:47:30Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS ONEen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcid2435601en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid18596926en_GB


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record