Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBass, Daviden_GB
dc.contributor.authorRichards, Thomas Aen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMatthai, Lenaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorMarsh, Victoriaen_GB
dc.contributor.authorCavalier-Smith, Thomasen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-28T21:21:50Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:46:52Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:47:34Z
dc.date.issued2007-09-13en_GB
dc.description.abstractBackground It is much debated whether microbes are easily dispersed globally or whether they, like many macro-organisms, have historical biogeographies. The ubiquitous dispersal hypothesis states that microbes are so numerous and so easily dispersed worldwide that all should be globally distributed and found wherever growing conditions suit them. This has been broadly upheld for protists (microbial eukaryotes) by most morphological and some molecular analyses. However, morphology and most previously used evolutionary markers evolve too slowly to test this important hypothesis adequately. Results Here we use a fast-evolving marker (ITS1 rDNA) to map global diversity and distribution of three different clades of cercomonad Protozoa (Eocercomonas and Paracercomonas: phylum Cercozoa) by sequencing multiple environmental gene libraries constructed from 47–80 globally-dispersed samples per group. Even with this enhanced resolution, identical ITS sequences (ITS-types) were retrieved from widely separated sites and on all continents for several genotypes, implying relatively rapid global dispersal. Some identical ITS-types were even recovered from both marine and non-marine samples, habitats that generally harbour significantly different protist communities. Conversely, other ITS-types had either patchy or restricted distributions. Conclusion Our results strongly suggest that geographic dispersal in macro-organisms and microbes is not fundamentally different: some taxa show restricted and/or patchy distributions while others are clearly cosmopolitan. These results are concordant with the 'moderate endemicity model' of microbial biogeography. Rare or continentally endemic microbes may be ecologically significant and potentially of conservational concern. We also demonstrate that strains with identical 18S but different ITS1 rDNA sequences can differ significantly in terms of morphological and important physiological characteristics, providing strong additional support for global protist biodiversity being significantly higher than previously thought.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationBMC Evolutionary Biology 2007 7:162en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/1471-2148-7-162en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/38242en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/7/162en_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright © 2007 Bass et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.en_GB
dc.titleDNA evidence for global dispersal and probable endemicity of protozoaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2007-09-13en_GB
dc.date.available2008-09-28T21:21:50Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:46:52Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:47:34Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-2148en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Evolutionary Biologyen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcid2194784en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid17854485en_GB


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record