Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDelhey, Kasparen_GB
dc.contributor.authorPeters, Anneen_GB
dc.contributor.authorTregenza, Tomen_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-09-28T22:01:00Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T11:46:50Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:47:22Z
dc.date.issued2008-02-27en_GB
dc.description.abstractBackground Increased variability in sexually selected ornaments, a key assumption of evolutionary theory, is thought to be maintained through condition-dependence. Condition-dependent handicap models of sexual selection predict that (a) sexually selected traits show amplified variability compared to equivalent non-sexually selected traits, and since males are usually the sexually selected sex, that (b) males are more variable than females, and (c) sexually dimorphic traits more variable than monomorphic ones. So far these predictions have only been tested for metric traits. Surprisingly, they have not been examined for bright coloration, one of the most prominent sexual traits. This omission stems from computational difficulties: different types of colours are quantified on different scales precluding the use of coefficients of variation. Methodology/Principal Findings Based on physiological models of avian colour vision we develop an index to quantify the degree of discriminable colour variation as it can be perceived by conspecifics. A comparison of variability in ornamental and non-ornamental colours in six bird species confirmed (a) that those coloured patches that are sexually selected or act as indicators of quality show increased chromatic variability. However, we found no support for (b) that males generally show higher levels of variability than females, or (c) that sexual dichromatism per se is associated with increased variability. Conclusions/Significance We show that it is currently possible to realistically estimate variability of animal colours as perceived by them, something difficult to achieve with other traits. Increased variability of known sexually-selected/quality-indicating colours in the studied species, provides support to the predictions borne from sexual selection theory but the lack of increased overall variability in males or dimorphic colours in general indicates that sexual differences might not always be shaped by similar selective forces.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPLoS ONE 2008 3(2)en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0001689en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/38256en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_GB
dc.rightsDelhey, Peters. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_GB
dc.titleQuantifying Variability of Avian Colours: Are Signalling Traits More Variable?en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-02-27en_GB
dc.date.available2008-09-28T22:01:00Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T11:46:50Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:47:22Z
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203en_GB
dc.identifier.journalPLoS ONEen_GB
dc.identifier.pmcid2253496en_GB
dc.identifier.pmid18301766en_GB


Files in this item

FilesSizeFormatView

There are no files associated with this item.

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record