Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrench, Henryen_GB
dc.contributor.authorRothery, Marken_GB
dc.contributor.departmentUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.date.accessioned2008-12-02T12:38:24Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T10:52:47Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-20T14:14:51Z
dc.date.issued2008-11en_GB
dc.description.abstractCompared with studies of earlier and later centuries, discussion of masculinity in the ‘long’ eighteenth century has often concentrated on typifying discourses abstracted from conduct literature, or by reference to gender values expressed in prosecutions and publications relating to ‘deviant’ sexualities. Less attention has been given to identifying private understandings of masculine norms embedded in family correspondence. This study identifies values that were ‘routinized’ within a sample of landed families, that is, those norms rendered unremarkable by everyday rehearsal and mentioned only in passing. It focuses particularly on a ‘make-or-break’ moment in male development – sons’ departure from direct parental control. This pivotal step offered the chance to enact ideals of masculine autonomy, self-control and independence, but carried the risks of debt, disease or disgrace. This article evaluates three important aspects of the tense relationship between filial ‘entry into the world’ and parental expectations. Firstly, it explores parental understandings of this dilemma, and illustrates how fears were counter-balanced by recognition of the importance of personal autonomy within practices of elite masculinity. Secondly, it shows how families mitigated the perils of filial independence, particularly by inculcating ‘familial’ values, and selecting appropriate role models (often siblings). Thirdly, it examines sons’ responses to these efforts, and whether hidden differences of opinion were concealed beneath outward conformity. These private unpublished records demonstrate a number of insights into elite masculinity. Despite the inherent dangers involved in the process, the gentry deemed the beginnings of independence to be crucial to their sons’ development as men and negotiated the process in various ways. Ongoing support was provided by family members. Women were amongst the most important of these and mothers played a very important part in both advising and admonishing. Parents and other family members were more likely to recommend the example of living role models than to suggest particular conduct books or advice manuals. Family cultures of masculinity were apparent in this correspondence as well as the broader social assumptions about manhood that informed them, and demonstrate a greater degree of continuity in gender norms than has previously been supposed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipBritish Academy research grant SG-46123, 'Practices of politeness: changing norms of masculinity in landed society, 1660-1800'; AHRC research project AH/E007791/1, 'Man's Estate: Masculinity & Landed Gentility in England, c. 1660-1918'en_GB
dc.identifier.citation33(4), pp.402-422en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/03071020802410387en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/41684en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherTaylor & Francisen_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/rshien_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://www.informaworld.com/smpp/content~content=a905234449~db=all~order=pageen_GB
dc.subjectgender historyen_GB
dc.subjectmasculinityen_GB
dc.subject18th centuryen_GB
dc.subjectupper classesen_GB
dc.title"Upon your entry into the world": masculine values and the threshold of adulthood among landed elites in England, 1680-1800en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2008-12-02T12:38:24Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T10:52:47Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-20T14:14:51Z
dc.identifier.issn0307-1022en_GB
dc.descriptionPost-print version. 18 month embargo by the publisher. Article will be released May 2010.en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1470-1200en_GB
dc.identifier.journalSocial Historyen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record