Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorAlbelooshi, Abdulsalamen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-06T10:09:02Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2011-01-25T17:24:51Zen_GB
dc.date.accessioned2013-03-21T12:52:31Z
dc.date.issued2008-08-15en_GB
dc.description.abstractInsider dealing on the basis of inside information has been identified as an action against the principle of equal access to information for all those who need such information to make investment decisions. This thesis examines the regulation of insider dealing in financial markets. It analyses in particular the problem of the regulation of insider dealing in the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the shortcomings of this regulation and how it can be improved. The primary objective of the thesis is to offer reasonable recommendations for the reform of insider dealing in the UAE. There have been controversies regarding whether insider dealing should be regulated, the basis of such regulation and the form in which the law should intervene. This thesis has attempted to provide its own approach to the problem of insider dealing. This approach forwards the proposition that allowing insider dealing on the basis of inside information is against the principle of equal access to information and it is detrimental to market transparency. Based on this proposition, the thesis investigates the shortcomings of the current regulation of insider dealing in the UAE. Following this the applied study, which consists of a questionnaire and interviews conducted in the UAE, provides a clearer picture of the current regulation in the country. The study aims at measuring opinions and attitudes of investors and other experts towards the basis and effectiveness of the regulation of insider dealing in local markets in the UAE. This is followed by a legal comparative study. This is both a ‘macro-comparison’ and a ‘micro-comparison’ between the regulation of insider dealing in the jurisdictions of the US, the UK and the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC). The ‘macro-comparison’ draws conclusions from comparing the broader systems of regulation in the three jurisdictions. The ‘micro-comparison’ concentrates on a functional comparison between the specific rules related to insider dealing. The legal comparative study is combined with the information generated by the applied study. Together these provide solutions (represented as recommendations) for the reform of the UAE larger system of regulation, and amendments to the rules related to insider dealing.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSponsored by The Government of Dubaien_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10036/47094en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectinsider dealingen_GB
dc.subjectUAEen_GB
dc.subjectsecurities regulationen_GB
dc.subjectDubai International Financial Centreen_GB
dc.subjectfinancial market regulationen_GB
dc.subjectcomparative regulationen_GB
dc.titleThe Regulation of Insider Dealing: An Applied and Comparative Legal Study towards Reform in the UAE.en_GB
dc.typeThesis or dissertationen_GB
dc.date.available2009-01-06T10:09:02Zen_GB
dc.date.available2011-01-25T17:24:51Zen_GB
dc.date.available2013-03-21T12:52:31Z
dc.contributor.advisorDrury, Roberten_GB
dc.publisher.departmentSchool of Lawen_GB
dc.type.degreetitlePhD in Lawen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnamePhDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record