The Governance of Collaboration in Local Public Service Delivery Networks

DSpace/Manakin Repository

Open Research Exeter (ORE)

The Governance of Collaboration in Local Public Service Delivery Networks

Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:


Title: The Governance of Collaboration in Local Public Service Delivery Networks
Author: Moseley, Alice
Advisor: James, Oliver
Citation: Moseley, A. & James, O. 2008. ‘Central State Steering of Local Collaboration: Assessing the Impact of Tools of Meta-governance in Homelessness Services in England’. Public Organization Review, 8 (2): 117-136.
Publisher: University of Exeter
Date Issued: 2008-10-31
Abstract: Multi-agency collaboration is often advocated as a means of tackling cross-cutting areas of public services and viewed as a solution to service fragmentation, with local agencies on the receiving end of government exhortations to collaborate. Yet there is relatively little research examining the effectiveness of policy tools and mechanisms aiming to stimulate local collaboration. This thesis examines the influence and dynamics of vertical and horizontal coordination tools, investigating their potential to enhance collaboration in local public service delivery networks and to reduce negative externalities. A theoretical framework is employed which synthesises models of policy implementation and bureaucratic decision-making. The empirical research is conducted in relation to organisations working with the homeless in England, and the research methods include a survey of Local Authorities and interviews with civil servants and frontline professionals. While governmental attempts to foster collaboration are partially effective, there are weaknesses with some of the policy tools employed, and limits to State control. Local actors’ collaborative decision-making is influenced more by ‘bottom-up’ than by ‘top-down’ factors. Moreover, the competitive context in which service providers operate leads them to pursue strategies to promote their own organisational interests rather than working towards a dominant common interest. The strategies employed are broadly in line with a bureaucratic politics perspective, and include failure to share information, possessiveness over client outcomes and projecting an image of success rather than sharing problems. Nevertheless, formal collaborative mechanisms do have the potential to alleviate externalities associated with fragmented systems. With strong local management and appropriate central facilitation, they can help to meet client needs and to counter fragmentation, ultimately leading to better services.
Type: Thesis or dissertation
Keywords: collaborationgovernancecoordinationimplementationhomelessnessbureaucratic politics
Funders/Sponsor: Economic and Social Research Council/ Office of the Deputy Prime Minister/ Price Waterhouse Coopers
Grant Number: PTA-039-2004-00006

Please note: Before reusing this item please check the rights under which it has been made available. Some items are restricted to non-commercial use. Please cite the published version where applicable.

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
MoseleyA_fm.pdf 88.96Kb PDF Thumbnail
MoseleyA.pdf 1.787Mb PDF Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)


My Account

Local Links