Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFieldsend, Jonathan E.
dc.date.accessioned2013-07-11T10:45:04Z
dc.date.issued2004-03-01
dc.description.abstractThis study compares a number of selection regimes for the choosing of global best (gbest) and personal best (pbest) for swarm members in multi-objective particle swarm optimisation (MOPSO). Two distinct gbest selection techniques are shown to exist in the literature, those that do not restrict the selection of archive members and those with `distance' based gbest selection techniques. Theoretical justification for both of these approaches is discussed, in terms of the two types of search that these methods promote, and the potential problem of particle clumping in MOPSO is described. The popular pbest selection methods in the literature are also compared, and the ffect of the recently introduced turbulence term is viewed in terms of the additional search it promotes, across all parameter combinations. In light of the discussion, new avenues of MOPSO research are highlighted.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipDepartment of Computer Science, University of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.citationReport No. 419, Department of Computer Science, University of Exeteren_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/11705
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Exeteren_GB
dc.subjectMulti-objective optimisationen_GB
dc.subjectparticle swarm optimisationen_GB
dc.titleMulti-Objective Particle Swarm Optimisation Methodsen_GB
dc.typeReporten_GB
dc.date.available2013-07-11T10:45:04Z
exeter.confidentialfalse
dc.descriptionCopyright © 2004 University of Exeteren_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record