Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNelms, S
dc.contributor.authorEyles, L
dc.contributor.authorGodley, B
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, P
dc.contributor.authorSelley, H
dc.contributor.authorSolandt, J-L
dc.contributor.authorWitt, M
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-12T10:02:51Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-13
dc.description.abstractMarine Protected Areas (MPAs) are designated to enable the management of damaging activities within a discrete spatial area, and can be effective at reducing the associated impacts, including habitat loss and over-exploitation. Such sites, however, may be exposed to the potential impacts from broader scale pressures, such as anthropogenic litter, due to its diffuse nature and lack of constraint by legislative and/or political boundaries. Plastic, a large component of litter, is of particular concern, due to increasing evidence of its potential to cause ecological and socio-economic damage. The presence of sensitive marine features may mean that some MPAs are at greater potential risk from the impacts of plastic pollution than some non-protected sites. Understanding the abundance, distribution and composition of litter along coastlines is important for designing and implementing effective management strategies. Gathering such data, however, can be expensive and time37 consuming but litter survey programmes that enlist citizen scientists are often able to resolve many of the logistical or financial constraints. Here, we examine data collected over 25-years (1994 – 2018), by Marine Conservation Society volunteers, for spatial patterns in relation to the English MPA network, with the aim of highlighting key sources of litter and identifying management priority areas. We found that MPAs in southeast (Kent) and southwest (Cornwall and Devon) England have the highest densities of shore-based litter. Plastic is the main material constituent and public littering the most common identifiable source. Items attributed to fishing activities were most prevalent in southwest MPAs and sewage related debris was highest in MPAs near large rivers and estuaries, indicating localised accumulation. When comparing inside and outside of MPAs, we found no difference in litter density, demonstrating the need for wider policy intervention at local, national and international scales to reduce the amount of plastic pollution.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Englanden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationArticle 114365en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114365
dc.identifier.grantnumberNE/L002434/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/S025529/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120222
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 13 March 2021 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights© 2020. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
dc.subjectCitizen-scienceen_GB
dc.subjectLitteren_GB
dc.subjectMarine Protected Areasen_GB
dc.subjectPlastic Pollutionen_GB
dc.subjectPolicyen_GB
dc.titleInvestigating the distribution and regional occurrence of anthropogenic litter in English Marine Protected Areas using 25 years of citizen-science beach clean dataen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-03-12T10:02:51Z
dc.identifier.issn0269-7491
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalEnvironmental Pollutionen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-10
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-10
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-03-11T16:51:59Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/