Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRicci-Cabello, I
dc.contributor.authorGangannagaripalli, J
dc.contributor.authorMounce, LTA
dc.contributor.authorValderas, JM
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-18T13:13:59Z
dc.date.issued2020-03-13
dc.description.abstractObjective The aim of the study was to identify the main factors leading to harm in primary care based on the experiences reported by patients. Methods We conducted a mixed-methods, cross-sectional study in 45 primary care centers in England. A random sample of 6736 patients was invited to complete the Patient-Reported Experiences and Outcomes of Safety in Primary Care questionnaire. We fitted structural equation modeling on the quantitative data (n = 1244 respondents) to identify contributory factors and primary incidents leading to harm. We conducted content analyses of responses to seven open-ended questions (n = 386) to obtain deeper insight into patient perceptions of the causes of harm experienced. Results from quantitative and qualitative analyses were triangulated. Results Patients reported harm related to physical health (13%), pain (11%), and mental health (19%) and harm that increased limitations in social activities (14%). Physical harm was associated with incidents affecting diagnosis (β = 0.43; delayed and wrong), and treatment (0.12; delayed, wrong treatment, or dose), which were in turn associated with incidents with patient-provider communication, coordination between providers, appointments, and laboratory tests. Pain was associated with laboratory tests (0.21; caused when collecting blood or tissue samples) and with problems booking an appointment when needed (0.13; delaying treatment for pain). Harm to mental health was associated with incidents related to the following: diagnosis (0.28), patient-provider communication (0.18), appointments (0.17), coordination between different providers (0.14), and laboratory tests (0.12). Harm increasing limitations in social activities was associated with incidents related to diagnosis (0.42) and diagnostic and monitoring procedures (0.20). Conclusions Our findings suggest the need for patient-centered strategies to reduce harm in primary care focusing on the improvement of the quality of diagnosis and patient-provider communication.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 13 March 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/pts.0000000000000669
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120317
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherLippincott, Williams & Wilkinsen_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 13 March 202 in compliance with publisher policy.en_GB
dc.rightsCopyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserveden_GB
dc.subjectpatient safetyen_GB
dc.subjectprimary health careen_GB
dc.subjectobservational studyen_GB
dc.subjectqualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectlatent class analysisen_GB
dc.titleIdentifying Factors Leading to Harm in English General Practicesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-03-18T13:13:59Z
dc.identifier.issn1549-8417
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalJournal of Patient Safetyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserveden_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-13
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-03-18T13:09:01Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record