Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMacovei, VA
dc.contributor.authorHartman, SE
dc.contributor.authorSchuster, U
dc.contributor.authorTorres-Valdés, S
dc.contributor.authorMoore, CM
dc.contributor.authorSanders, RJ
dc.date.accessioned2020-03-23T15:31:26Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-20
dc.description.abstractThe ocean is currently a significant net sink for anthropogenically remobilised CO2, taking up around 24% of global emissions. Numerical models predict a diversity of responses of the ocean carbon sink to increased atmospheric concentrations in a warmer world. Here, we tested the hypothesis that increased atmospheric forcing is causing a change in the ocean carbon sink using a high frequency observational dataset derived from underway pCO2 (carbon dioxide partial pressure) instruments on ships of opportunity (SOO) and a fixed-point mooring between 2002 and 2016. We calculated an average carbon flux of 0.013 Pg yr−1 into the ocean at the Porcupine Abyssal Plain (PAP) site, consistent with past estimates. In spite of the increase in atmospheric pCO2, monthly average seawater pCO2 did not show a statistically significant increasing trend, but a higher annual variability, likely due to the decreasing buffer capacity of the system. The increasing ΔpCO2 led to an increasing trend in the estimated CO2 flux into the ocean of 0.19 ± 0.03 mmol m−2 day−1 per year across the entire 15 year time series, making the study area a stronger carbon sink. Seawater pCO2 variability is mostly influenced by temperature, alkalinity and dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) changes, with 77% of the annual seawater pCO2 changes explained by these terms. DIC is in turn influenced by gas exchange and biological production. In an average year, the DIC drawdown by biological production, as determined from nitrate uptake, was higher than the DIC increase due to atmospheric CO2 dissolution into the surface ocean. This effect was enhanced in years with high nutrient input or shallow mixed layers. Using the rate of change of DIC and nitrate, we observed Redfieldian carbon consumption during the spring bloom at a C:N ratio of 6.2 ± 1.6. A comparison between SOO and PAP sustained observatory data revealed a strong agreement for pCO2 and DIC. This work demonstrates that the study area has continued to absorb atmospheric CO2 in recent years with this sink enhancing over time. Furthermore, the change in pCO2 per unit nitrate became larger as surface buffer capacity changed.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNatural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Commissionen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEuropean Space Agencyen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 180, 102223en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.pocean.2019.102223
dc.identifier.grantnumberAZ 02/KF/13en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/M50046X/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberEDU/42248en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/M022099/1en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberRG160962en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120375
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.relation.urlhttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/122683
dc.rights© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).en_GB
dc.subjectpCO2 variabilityen_GB
dc.subjectCO2 fluxen_GB
dc.subjectBiological productionen_GB
dc.subjectNorth Atlanticen_GB
dc.titleImpact of physical and biological processes on temporal variations of the ocean carbon sink in the mid-latitude North Atlantic (2002–2016)en_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-03-23T15:31:26Z
dc.identifier.issn0079-6611
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from Elsevier via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionThe corrigendum to this article is available in ORE at http://hdl.handle.net/10871/122683
dc.identifier.journalProgress in Oceanographyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-11-13
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
exeter.funder::European Commissionen_GB
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
exeter.funder::European Space Agencyen_GB
exeter.funder::European Commissionen_GB
exeter.funder::Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)en_GB
exeter.funder::European Commissionen_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-03-23T15:28:36Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-03-23T15:31:30Z
refterms.panelCen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).