Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFord, J
dc.contributor.authorThomas, F
dc.contributor.authorByng, R
dc.contributor.authorMcCabe, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-03T07:37:12Z
dc.date.issued2020-06-20
dc.description.abstractWe analyze the use of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9), an instrument that is widely used in diagnosing and determining the severity of depression. Using conversation analysis, we show how the doctor deploys the PHQ-9 in response to the patient’s doubts about whether she is depressed. Rather than relaying the PHQ-9 verbatim, the doctor deviates from the wording so that the response options are selectively offered to upgrade the severity of the patient’s symptoms. This works in favor of a positive diagnosis and is used to justify a treatment recommendation that the patient previously resisted. This contrasted with the rest of the dataset, where diagnosis was either not delivered (as patients are presenting with ongoing problems) or was delivered without using the PHQ-9. When clinician-administered, the PHQ9 can be influenced by how response items are presented. This can lead either to downgrading or upgrading the severity of depression.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 20 June 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1049732320924625
dc.identifier.grantnumberES/N018281/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120527
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherSAGE Publicationsen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). PMID: 32564676
dc.titleUse of the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) in Practice: Interactions between patients and physiciansen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-04-03T07:37:12Z
dc.identifier.issn1049-7323
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from SAGE Publications via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalQualitative Health Researchen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-26
exeter.funder::Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-26
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-04-03T07:35:18Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-07-27T09:20:22Z
refterms.panelDen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
PMID: 32564676
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s) 2020. Open access. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). PMID: 32564676