The decarbonisation of heating represents a transformative challenge for many countries.
The UK’s net-zero greenhouse gas emissions target requires the removal of fossil fuel
combustion from heating in just three decades. A greater understanding of policy processes
linked to system transformations is expected to be of value for ...
The decarbonisation of heating represents a transformative challenge for many countries.
The UK’s net-zero greenhouse gas emissions target requires the removal of fossil fuel
combustion from heating in just three decades. A greater understanding of policy processes
linked to system transformations is expected to be of value for understanding systemic
change; how policy makers perceive policy issues can impact on policy change with knockon effects for energy system change. This article builds on the literature considering policy
maker perceptions and focuses on the issue of UK heat policy. Using qualitative analysis, we
show that policy makers perceive heat decarbonisation as disruptive, technological
pathways are seen as deeply uncertain and heat decarbonisation appears to offer policy
makers little ‘up-side’. Perceptions are bounded by uncertainty, affected by concerns over
negative impacts, influenced by external influences and relate to ideas of continuity. Further
research and evidence on optimal heat decarbonisation and an adaptive approach to
governance could support policy makers to deliver policy commensurate with heat
decarbonisation. However even with reduced uncertainty and more flexible governance, the
perceptions of disruption to consumers mean that transformative heat policy may remain
unpopular for policy makers, potentially putting greenhouse mitigation targets at risk of being
missed