Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorGossage-Worrall, R
dc.contributor.authorHind, D
dc.contributor.authorBarnard-Kelly, KD
dc.contributor.authorShiers, D
dc.contributor.authorEtherington, A
dc.contributor.authorSwaby, L
dc.contributor.authorHolt, RIG
dc.contributor.authorBarnard-Kelly, K
dc.contributor.authorGossage-Worrall, R
dc.contributor.authorBradburn, M
dc.contributor.authorHind, D
dc.contributor.authorSaxon, D
dc.contributor.authorSwaby, L
dc.contributor.authorFrench, P
dc.contributor.authorPendlebury, J
dc.contributor.authorWright, S
dc.contributor.authorWaller, G
dc.contributor.authorMcCrone, P
dc.contributor.authorMorris, T
dc.contributor.authorEdwardson, C
dc.contributor.authorKhunti, K
dc.contributor.authorDavies, M
dc.contributor.authorCarey, M
dc.contributor.authorDoherty, Y
dc.contributor.authorNorthern, A
dc.contributor.authorBarnett, J
dc.contributor.authorLaugharne, R
dc.contributor.authorDickens, C
dc.contributor.authorDickens, C
dc.contributor.authorGreenwood, K
dc.contributor.authorGaughran, F
dc.contributor.authorKalidindi, S
dc.contributor.authorRathod, S
dc.contributor.authorSiddiqi, N
dc.contributor.authorEtherington, A
dc.contributor.authorShiers, D
dc.contributor.authorSTEPWISE Research Group
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-27T09:39:40Z
dc.date.issued2019-11-13
dc.description.abstractBackground STEPWISE is a theory-informed self-management education programme that was co-produced with service users, healthcare professionals and interventionists to support weight loss for people with schizophrenia. We report the process evaluation to inform understanding about the intervention and its effectiveness in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) that evaluated its efficacy. Methods Following the UK Medical Research Council (MRC) Guidelines for developing and evaluating complex interventions, we explored implementation quality. We considered causal mechanisms, unanticipated consequences and contextual factors associated with variation in actual and intended outcomes, and integrated treatment fidelity, using the programme theory and a pipeline logic model. We followed a modified version of Linnan and Steckler’s framework and single case design. Qualitative data from semi-structured telephone interviews with service-users (n = 24), healthcare professionals delivering the intervention (n = 20) and interventionists (n = 7) were triangulated with quantitative process and RCT outcome data and with observations by interventionists, to examine convergence within logic model components. Results Training and course materials were available although lacked co-ordination in some trusts. Healthcare professionals gained knowledge and some contemplated changing their practice to reflect the (facilitative) ‘style’ of delivery. They were often responsible for administrative activities increasing the burden of delivery. Healthcare professionals recognised the need to address antipsychotic-induced weight gain and reported potential value from the intervention (subject to the RCT results). However, some doubted senior management commitment and sustainability post-trial. Service-users found the intervention highly acceptable, especially being in a group of people with similar experiences. Service-users perceived weight loss and lifestyle benefits; however, session attendance varied with 23% (n = 47) attending all group-sessions and 17% (n = 36) attending none. Service-users who lost weight wanted closer monitoring and many healthcare professionals wanted to monitor outcomes (e.g. weight) but it was outside the intervention design. No clinical or cost benefit was demonstrated from the intermediate outcomes (RCT) and any changes in RCT outcomes were not due to the intervention. Conclusions This process evaluation provides a greater understanding of why STEPWISE was unsuccessful in promoting weight loss during the clinical trial. Further research is required to evaluate whether different levels of contact and objective monitoring can support people with schizophrenia to lose weight.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19: 358en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12888-019-2282-5
dc.identifier.grantnumber12/28/05en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120812
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.rightsThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectComplex interventionen_GB
dc.subjectProcess evaluationen_GB
dc.subjectSchizophreniaen_GB
dc.subjectPsychosisen_GB
dc.subjectWeight managementen_GB
dc.subjectLogic modelen_GB
dc.titleSTructured lifestyle education for people WIth SchizophrEnia (STEPWISE): mixed methods process evaluation of a group-based lifestyle education programme to support weight loss in people with schizophreniaen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-04-27T09:39:40Z
dc.identifier.issn1471-244X
exeter.article-numberARTN 358en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMC Psychiatryen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-09-10
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-11-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-04-27T09:36:33Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-04-27T09:39:53Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
refterms.depositExceptionExplanationhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-019-2282-5


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.