Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKouloumpis, V
dc.contributor.authorPell, RS
dc.contributor.authorCorrea-Cano, ME
dc.contributor.authorYan, X
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-07T08:00:17Z
dc.date.issued2020-04-13
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study is to investigate whether eliminating plastics entirely under existing waste infrastructure and management practices could have an adverse effect on climate change, using a case study on the hypothetical substitution of Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) with glass as the material for bottling liquids in the domestic sector in Cornwall, England. A life cycle environmental impacts-based model was created using high resolution local data on household waste and current management practices in combination with Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) datasets. The model allows users to define key system parameters such as masses of materials, transport options and end-of-life processes and produces results for 11 environmental impact categories including the Global Warming Potential (GWP). The results from the application of this model on the case study of Cornwall have shown that the substitution of PET with glass as the material for bottling under the current waste infrastructure and management practices could lead to significant increases in GWP and hinder efforts to tackle climate change. A sensitivity analysis of the glass/PET mass ratio suggests that in order to achieve equal GWP the glass bottles need to become approximately 38% of the weight they are now. Increasing the recycled content and decreasing losses during the recycling processes could also help lower the GWP by 18.9% and 14.5%, respectively. This model can be expanded further to include more types of plastics and other regions to evaluate designs of new regional circular economy with less plastics waste and pollution. Our study suggests that it is necessary and crucial to consider the specific waste infrastructure and management practices in place and use science-based models that incorporate life cycle thinking to evaluate any solutions to plastics pollution in order to avoid problem shifting.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 727, article 138681en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138681
dc.identifier.grantnumberEP/S025529/1en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/120968
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherElsevieren_GB
dc.rights.embargoreasonUnder embargo until 13 April 2021 in compliance with publisher policyen_GB
dc.rights © 2020. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dc.subjectCircular economyen_GB
dc.subjectLCAen_GB
dc.subjectPlasticsen_GB
dc.subjectWaste managementen_GB
dc.subjectDecision supporten_GB
dc.titlePotential trade-offs between eliminating plastics and mitigating climate change: An LCA perspective on Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) bottles in Cornwallen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-05-07T08:00:17Z
dc.identifier.issn0048-9697
dc.descriptionThis is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from Elsevier via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalScience of the Total Environmenten_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-04-11
exeter.funder::Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)en_GB
rioxxterms.versionAMen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-04-13
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-05-07T07:58:01Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2021-04-12T23:00:00Z
refterms.panelBen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

 © 2020. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/  
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as  © 2020. This version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/