Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorCarlton, EW
dc.contributor.authorIngram, J
dc.contributor.authorTaylor, H
dc.contributor.authorGlynn, J
dc.contributor.authorKandiyali, R
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, S
dc.contributor.authorBeasant, L
dc.contributor.authorAziz, S
dc.contributor.authorBeresford, P
dc.contributor.authorKendall, J
dc.contributor.authorReuben, A
dc.contributor.authorSmith, JE
dc.contributor.authorChapman, R
dc.contributor.authorCreanor, S
dc.contributor.authorBenger, JR
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-13T12:13:07Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-05
dc.description.abstractIntroduction The clinical effectiveness of a ‘rule-out’ acute coronary syndrome (ACS) strategy for emergency department patients with chest pain, incorporating a single undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) taken at presentation, together with a non-ischaemic ECG, remains unknown. Methods A randomised controlled trial, across eight hospitals in the UK, aimed to establish the clinical effectiveness of an undetectable hs-cTn and ECG (limit of detection and ECG discharge (LoDED)) discharge strategy. Eligible adult patients presented with chest pain; the treating clinician intended to perform investigations to rule out an ACS; the initial ECG was non-ischaemic; and peak symptoms occurred <6 hours previously. Participants were randomised 1:1 to either the LoDED strategy or the usual rule-out strategy. The primary outcome was discharge from the hospital within 4 hours of arrival, without a major adverse cardiac event (MACE) within 30 days. Results Between June 2018 and March 2019, 632 patients were randomised; 3 were later withdrawn. Of 629 patients (age 53.8 (SD 16.1) years, 41% women), 7% had a MACE within 30 days. For the LoDED strategy, 141 of 309 (46%) patients were discharged within 4 hours, without MACE within 30 days, and for usual care, 114 of 311 (37%); pooled adjusted OR 1.58 (95% CI 0.84 to 2.98). No patient with an initial undetectable hs-cTn had a MACE within 30 days. Conclusion The LoDED strategy facilitates safe early discharge in >40% of patients with chest pain. Clinical effectiveness is variable when compared with existing rule-out strategies and influenced by wider system factors.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.identifier.citationPublished online 5 May 2020en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/heartjnl-2020-316692
dc.identifier.grantnumberPB-PG-0416-20012en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121032
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Group / British Cardiovascular Societyen_GB
dc.rights© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleLimit of detection of troponin discharge strategy versus usual care: randomised controlled trialen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-05-13T12:13:07Z
dc.identifier.issn1355-6037
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: Data are available upon reasonable request. Summary data collected from the study, including de-identified patient level data, can be made available upon request to the corresponding author.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalHearten_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-03-30
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-03-30
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-05-13T12:11:24Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-05-13T12:13:13Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.