Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLong, H
dc.contributor.authorMoore, D
dc.contributor.authorRobinson, S
dc.contributor.authorSansom, A
dc.contributor.authorAylward, A
dc.contributor.authorFletcher, E
dc.contributor.authorWelsman, J
dc.contributor.authorDean, SG
dc.contributor.authorCampbell, JL
dc.contributor.authorAnderson, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-28T09:09:21Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-12
dc.description.abstractBackground UK general practitioners (GPs) are leaving direct patient care in significant numbers. We undertook a systematic review of qualitative research to identify factors affecting GPs’ leaving behaviour in the workforce as part of a wider mixed methods study (ReGROUP). Objective To identify factors that affect GPs’ decisions to leave direct patient care. Methods Qualitative interview-based studies were identified and their quality was assessed. A thematic analysis was performed and an explanatory model was constructed providing an overview of factors affecting UK GPs. Non-UK studies were considered separately. Results Six UK interview-based studies and one Australian interview-based study were identified. Three central dynamics that are key to understanding UK GP leaving behaviour were identified: factors associated with low job satisfaction, high job satisfaction and those linked to the doctor–patient relationship. The importance of contextual influence on job satisfaction emerged. GPs with high job satisfaction described feeling supported by good practice relationships, while GPs with poor job satisfaction described feeling overworked and unsupported with negatively impacted doctor–patient relationships. Conclusions Many GPs report that job satisfaction directly relates to the quality of the doctor–patient relationship. Combined with changing relationships with patients and interfaces with secondary care, and the gradual sense of loss of autonomy within the workplace, many GPs report a reduction in job satisfaction. Once job satisfaction has become negatively impacted, the combined pressure of increased patient demand and workload, together with other stress factors, has left many feeling unsupported and vulnerable to burn-out and ill health, and ultimately to the decision to leave general practice.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 10, article e029846en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029846
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121189
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_GB
dc.rightsAuthor(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_GB
dc.titleUnderstanding why primary care doctors leave direct patient care: a systematic review of qualitative researchen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-05-28T09:09:21Z
dc.identifier.issn2044-6055
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from BMJ Publishing Group via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.descriptionData availability statement: All data relevant to the study are included in the article or uploaded as supplementary information. No additional data available.en_GB
dc.identifier.journalBMJ Openen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-01-31
exeter.funder::SW Academic Health Science Network Ltden_GB
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-01-31
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-02-11T10:02:31Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-05-28T09:09:29Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.