Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrance, EF
dc.contributor.authorCunningham, M
dc.contributor.authorRing, N
dc.contributor.authorUny, I
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, EAS
dc.contributor.authorJepson, RG
dc.contributor.authorMaxwell, M
dc.contributor.authorRoberts, RJ
dc.contributor.authorTurley, RL
dc.contributor.authorBooth, A
dc.contributor.authorBritten, N
dc.contributor.authorFlemming, K
dc.contributor.authorGallagher, I
dc.contributor.authorGarside, R
dc.contributor.authorHannes, K
dc.contributor.authorLewin, S
dc.contributor.authorNoblit, GW
dc.contributor.authorPope, C
dc.contributor.authorThomas, J
dc.contributor.authorVanstone, M
dc.contributor.authorHigginbottom, GMA
dc.contributor.authorNoyes, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T14:33:14Z
dc.date.issued2019-01-31
dc.description.abstractThe aim of this study was to provide guidance to improve the completeness and clarity of meta-ethnography reporting. Background: Evidence-based policy and practice require robust evidence syntheses which can further understanding of people's experiences and associated social processes. Meta-ethnography is a rigorous seven-phase qualitative evidence synthesis methodology, developed by Noblit and Hare. Meta-ethnography is used widely in health research, but reporting is often poor quality and this discourages trust in and use of its findings. Meta-ethnography reporting guidance is needed to improve reporting quality. Design: The eMERGe study used a rigorous mixed-methods design and evidence-based methods to develop the novel reporting guidance and explanatory notes. Methods: The study, conducted from 2015 to 2017, comprised of: (1) a methodological systematic review of guidance for meta-ethnography conduct and reporting; (2) a review and audit of published meta-ethnographies to identify good practice principles; (3) international, multidisciplinary consensus-building processes to agree guidance content; (4) innovative development of the guidance and explanatory notes. Findings: Recommendations and good practice for all seven phases of meta-ethnography conduct and reporting were newly identified leading to 19 reporting criteria and accompanying detailed guidance. Conclusion: The bespoke eMERGe Reporting Guidance, which incorporates new methodological developments and advances the methodology, can help researchers to report the important aspects of meta-ethnography. Use of the guidance should raise reporting quality. Better reporting could make assessments of confidence in the findings more robust and increase use of meta-ethnography outputs to improve practice, policy, and service user outcomes in health and other fields. This is the first tailored reporting guideline for meta-ethnography. This article is being simultaneously published in the following journals: Journal of Advanced Nursing, Psycho-oncology, Review of Education, and BMC Medical Research Methodology.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNational Institute for Health Research (NIHR)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipEconomic and Social Research Council (ESRC)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWellcome Trusten_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 19: 25en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0
dc.identifier.grantnumber13/114/60en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberRES-590-28-0005en_GB
dc.identifier.grantnumberWT087640MAen_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121589
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stateden_GB
dc.subjectGuidelineen_GB
dc.subjectMeta-ethnographyen_GB
dc.subjectNursingen_GB
dc.subjectPublication standardsen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative evidence synthesisen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectReportingen_GB
dc.subjectResearch designen_GB
dc.subjectSystematic reviewen_GB
dc.titleImproving reporting of meta-ethnography: The eMERGe reporting guidanceen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-06-22T14:33:14Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from the publisher via the DOI in this record.en_GB
dc.descriptionAdditional supporting information may be found online at https://osf.io/nmf7v/en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1471-2288
dc.identifier.journalBMC Medical Research Methodologyen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2019
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2019-01-31
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-22T14:28:45Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-06-22T14:33:18Z
refterms.panelAen_GB
refterms.depositExceptionpublishedGoldOA
refterms.depositExceptionExplanationhttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-018-0600-0


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). 2019 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated