Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorLewin, S
dc.contributor.authorBooth, A
dc.contributor.authorGlenton, C
dc.contributor.authorMunthe-Kaas, H
dc.contributor.authorRashidian, A
dc.contributor.authorWainwright, M
dc.contributor.authorBohren, MA
dc.contributor.authorTunçalp, Ö
dc.contributor.authorColvin, CJ
dc.contributor.authorGarside, R
dc.contributor.authorCarlsen, B
dc.contributor.authorLanglois, EV
dc.contributor.authorNoyes, J
dc.date.accessioned2020-06-22T15:11:53Z
dc.date.issued2018-01-25
dc.description.abstractThe GRADE-CERQual ('Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research') approach provides guidance for assessing how much confidence to place in findings from systematic reviews of qualitative research (or qualitative evidence syntheses). The approach has been developed to support the use of findings from qualitative evidence syntheses in decision-making, including guideline development and policy formulation. Confidence in the evidence from qualitative evidence syntheses is an assessment of the extent to which a review finding is a reasonable representation of the phenomenon of interest. CERQual provides a systematic and transparent framework for assessing confidence in individual review findings, based on consideration of four components: (1) methodological limitations, (2) coherence, (3) adequacy of data, and (4) relevance. A fifth component, dissemination (or publication) bias, may also be important and is being explored. As with the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach for effectiveness evidence, CERQual suggests summarising evidence in succinct, transparent, and informative Summary of Qualitative Findings tables. These tables are designed to communicate the review findings and the CERQual assessment of confidence in each finding. This article is the first of a seven-part series providing guidance on how to apply the CERQual approach. In this paper, we describe the rationale and conceptual basis for CERQual, the aims of the approach, how the approach was developed, and its main components. We also outline the purpose and structure of this series and discuss the growing role for qualitative evidence in decision-making. Papers 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 in this series discuss each CERQual component, including the rationale for including the component in the approach, how the component is conceptualised, and how it should be assessed. Paper 2 discusses how to make an overall assessment of confidence in a review finding and how to create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. The series is intended primarily for those undertaking qualitative evidence syntheses or using their findings in decision-making processes but is also relevant to guideline development agencies, primary qualitative researchers, and implementation scientists and practitioners.en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipWHOen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipNorad (Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation)en_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipResearch Council of Norwayen_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipCochrane Methods Innovation Funden_GB
dc.description.sponsorshipSouth African Medical Research Councilen_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 13, 2en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s13012-017-0688-3
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/121591
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherBMCen_GB
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_GB
dc.subjectQualitative evidence synthesisen_GB
dc.subjectQualitative researchen_GB
dc.subjectMethodologyen_GB
dc.subjectResearch designen_GB
dc.subjectSystematic review methodologyen_GB
dc.subjectEvidence-based practiceen_GB
dc.subjectGuidanceen_GB
dc.subjectConfidenceen_GB
dc.subjectGRADEen_GB
dc.subjectRecommendations for practiceen_GB
dc.titleApplying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: Introduction to the seriesen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-06-22T15:11:53Z
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available from BMC via the DOI in this record. en_GB
dc.descriptionAdditional materials are available on the GRADE-CERQual website (www.cerqual.org)en_GB
dc.identifier.eissn1748-5908
dc.identifier.journalImplementation Scienceen_GB
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-25
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2018-01-25
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-06-22T14:59:31Z
refterms.versionFCDVoR
refterms.dateFOA2020-06-22T15:11:59Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0
International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and
reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to
the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver
(http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © The Author(s). 2018 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.