Conservation implications of misidentification and killing of protected species
dc.contributor.author | Newth, JL | |
dc.contributor.author | Wood, KA | |
dc.contributor.author | McDonald, RA | |
dc.contributor.author | Nuno, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Semenov, I | |
dc.contributor.author | Chistyakov, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Mikhaylova, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Bearhop, S | |
dc.contributor.author | Belousova, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Glazov, P | |
dc.contributor.author | Cromie, RL | |
dc.contributor.author | Rees, EC | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-01T13:26:51Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019-03-27 | |
dc.description.abstract | Killing protected species mistaken for morphologically similar quarry species, or species with weaker protection, can hinder their conservation. Despite policy aims to reduce threats from illegal killing, information is lacking on susceptible species, conservation impacts and the identification accuracy of hunters. We examined the ability of hunters (n = 232) in Arctic Russia to identify the endangered Northwest European Bewick's swan Cygnus columbianus bewickii using photographs. Only 14% (n = 33) identified this species correctly and distinguished it from sympatric and congeneric whooper swans C. cygnus and mute swans C. olor , with 15% of individuals admitting to accidentally hunting a Bewick's swan in the previous 3 years. We conclude that there is a risk of Bewick's swans being shot accidentally when mistaken for similar species with less legal protection. Improving hunters' skills in discerning protected from legitimate quarry species is likely to be an effective tool for conservation of morphologically similar species. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Peter Smith Charitable Trust for Nature | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Olive Herbert Charitable Trust | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 1 (5), article e24 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/csp2.24 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/121736 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Wiley for Society for Conservation Biology | en_GB |
dc.rights | © 2019 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_GB |
dc.subject | identification accuracy | en_GB |
dc.subject | illegal killing | en_GB |
dc.subject | misidentification of protected species | en_GB |
dc.subject | mitigation | en_GB |
dc.subject | Russia | en_GB |
dc.title | Conservation implications of misidentification and killing of protected species | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-01T13:26:51Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2578-4854 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this record | en_GB |
dc.description | Data availability: All data supporting the results in this paper are available from Zenodo (digital repository). | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Conservation Science and Practice | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2019-03-09 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2019-03-09 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-07-01T13:24:46Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-07-01T13:26:55Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
refterms.depositException | publishedGoldOA |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2019 The Authors. Conservation Science and Practice published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of Society for Conservation Biology.
This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.