Diets of European polecat Mustela putorius in Great Britain during fifty years of population recovery
dc.contributor.author | Sainsbury, KA | |
dc.contributor.author | Shore, RF | |
dc.contributor.author | Schofield, H | |
dc.contributor.author | Croose, E | |
dc.contributor.author | Hantke, G | |
dc.contributor.author | Kitchener, AC | |
dc.contributor.author | McDonald, RA | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-19T07:56:48Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2020-02-23 | |
dc.description.abstract | Following nineteenth-century declines, polecats Mustela putorius are recolonising Great Britain. Polecat diet relates to two potential risks to recovery. First, rabbits Oryctolagus cuniculus, which are important prey for polecats, have experienced extreme population fluctuations, with near extirpation due to myxomatosis in the 1950s, recovery in 1960s–1990s and declines in 1990s–2010s. Second, polecats are secondarily exposed to anticoagulant rodenticides by eating contaminated rodents, and the frequency of polecat exposure to rodenticides is increasing. We analysed stomach contents from 99 polecats collected in 2012–2016 and compared results with earlier studies. Lagomorphs were the most abundant prey (66% frequency of occurrence, 95% confidence interval 53–74%), followed by other mammals (12%, 4–18%), amphibians (10%, 3–16%) and birds (7%, 1–13%). Diet varied seasonally; lagomorph occurrence was highest in spring and summer and lowest in autumn. Dietary niche breadth was greater in the 1960s, when rabbits were scarce, than in other decades, but did not differ between the 1990s and 2010s, indicating that diets have not diversified with recent rabbit declines. This may be because rabbit abundance is not yet low enough to cause dietary diversification or because polecats were collected in areas where rabbits were still abundant. Rodents did not increase in diet between the 1990s and 2010s and still occur with < 10% frequency, indicating that rodents need not contribute much to diet to expose polecats to rodenticides. This potentially limits the effectiveness of management actions designed to minimise polecat exposure to contaminated rodent prey. | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | Vincent Wildlife Trust | en_GB |
dc.description.sponsorship | University of Exeter | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Vol. 65, pp. 181 - 190 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1007/s13364-020-00484-0 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10871/122536 | |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | Springer | en_GB |
dc.rights | (C) The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. | en_GB |
dc.subject | polecat | en_GB |
dc.subject | Diet | en_GB |
dc.subject | rabbits | en_GB |
dc.subject | mustela putorius | en_GB |
dc.subject | species recovery | en_GB |
dc.title | Diets of European polecat Mustela putorius in Great Britain during fifty years of population recovery | en_GB |
dc.type | Article | en_GB |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-19T07:56:48Z | |
dc.identifier.issn | 2199-2401 | |
dc.description | This is the final version. Available from Springer via the DOI in this record. | en_GB |
dc.identifier.journal | Mammal Research | en_GB |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_GB |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2020-02-05 | |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_GB |
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate | 2020-02-05 | |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_GB |
refterms.dateFCD | 2020-08-19T07:53:17Z | |
refterms.versionFCD | VoR | |
refterms.dateFOA | 2020-08-19T07:56:52Z | |
refterms.panel | A | en_GB |
Files in this item
This item appears in the following Collection(s)
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as (C) The Author(s) 2020. Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.