Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorWatkins, L
dc.contributor.authorReuber, M
dc.contributor.authorPerera, B
dc.contributor.authorCourtenay, K
dc.contributor.authorBanks, R
dc.contributor.authorMurphy, E
dc.contributor.authorAngus‐Leppan, H
dc.contributor.authorShankar, R
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-24T11:30:44Z
dc.date.issued2020-08-19
dc.description.abstractBackground Valproate (VPA) is a known teratogen associated with greater risk of major congenital malformations and other neurodevelopmental sequelae than all other licensed antiepileptic medicines. To reduce the potential for VPA‐related teratogenicity, the European Medicines Agency issued recommendations in 2018. Over two‐thirds of women/girls with intellectual disability (ID) may have treatment‐resistant epilepsy that could benefit from VPA treatment. Aims This investigation compared VPA prescribing practice for women/girls with ID between European countries, specifically evaluating the practice in the UK with that in other countries. Methods An expert working group with representation from key stake‐holding organizations developed a survey for dissemination to relevant professionals across Europe. Results Seventy one responses were received (27 UK, 44 Europe). Clinicians in the UK were more likely to report that they are working to mandatory regulations compared with European respondents (P = .015). European respondents were less likely to be aware of user‐independent contraception options (P = .06). In The UK, VPA regulations were more likely to be applied to women with ID than in Europe (P = .024). Conclusion There is heterogeneity in the application of VPA regulations across Europe for women/girls with ID. In both the UK and Europe, the regulations lack suitable adjustments for specific ID‐related factors.en_GB
dc.identifier.citationVol. 143 (1), pp. 56-61en_GB
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/ane.13337
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10871/122617
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherWileyen_GB
dc.rights© 2020 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
dc.subjectintellectual disability
dc.subjectpregnancy
dc.subjectregulatory guidance
dc.subjectteratogenicity
dc.subjectvalproate
dc.titleValproate prescribing practices for women with intellectual disability across Europeen_GB
dc.typeArticleen_GB
dc.date.available2020-08-24T11:30:44Z
dc.identifier.issn0001-6314
exeter.article-numberane.13337en_GB
dc.descriptionThis is the final version. Available on open access from Wiley via the DOI in this recorden_GB
dc.identifier.journalActa Neurologica Scandinavicaen_GB
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_GB
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-08-16
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_GB
rioxxterms.licenseref.startdate2020-08-16
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_GB
refterms.dateFCD2020-08-24T11:17:29Z
refterms.versionFCDAM
refterms.dateFOA2020-09-09T14:39:46Z
refterms.panelAen_GB


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

© 2020 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
Except where otherwise noted, this item's licence is described as © 2020 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.